Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/garrytan/gstack/gstack-openclaw-retronpx skills add garrytan/gstack --skill gstack-openclaw-retrogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/garrytan/gstackWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00061 | $0.02475 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01238 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00495 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00248 |
Grade A, and why
gstack-openclaw-retro scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 300 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Weekly Engineering Retrospective
Generates a comprehensive engineering retrospective analyzing commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics. Team-aware: identifies the user running the command, then analyzes every contributor with per-person praise and growth opportunities.
Arguments
- Default: last 7 days
24h: last 24 hours14d: last 14 days30d: last 30 dayscompare: compare current window vs prior same-length window
Instructions
Parse the argument to determine the time window. Default to 7 days. All times should be reported in the user's local timezone.
Midnight-aligned windows: For day units, compute an absolute start date at local midnight. For example, if today is 2026-03-18 and the window is 7 days, the start date is 2026-03-11. Use --since="2026-03-11T00:00:00" for git log queries. For hour units, use --since="N hours ago".
Step 1: Gather Raw Data
First, fetch origin and identify the current user:
git fetch origin main --quiet
git config user.name
git config user.email
The name returned by git config user.name is "you" ... the person reading this retro. All other authors are teammates.
Run ALL of these git commands (they are independent):
# All commits with timestamps, subject, hash, author, files changed
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="%H|%aN|%ae|%ai|%s" --shortstat
# Per-commit test vs total LOC breakdown with author
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="COMMIT:%H|%aN" --numstat
# Commit timestamps for session detection and hourly distribution
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="%at|%aN|%ai|%s" | sort -n
# Files most frequently changed (hotspot analysis)
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="" --name-only | grep -v '^$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
# PR numbers from commit messages
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="%s" | grep -oE '[#!][0-9]+' | sort -t'#' -k1 | uniq
# Per-author file hotspots
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="AUTHOR:%aN" --name-only
# Per-author commit counts
git shortlog origin/main --since="<window>" -sn --no-merges
# Test file count
git ls-files 2>/dev/null | grep -E '(\.test\.|\.spec\.|_test\.|_spec\.)' | wc -l
# Test files changed in window
git log origin/main --since="<window>" --format="" --name-only | grep -E '\.(test|spec)\.' | sort -u | wc -l
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 300 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 46425d5caf92
gstack-openclaw-retro is a skill published in the GitHub repository garrytan/gstack (130,961 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 2,475 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
agent-host-chat-contributions
Build and review cross-cutting agent-host chat behavior through lifecycle contributions. Use when adding turn lifecycle side effects, prompt or context injection, restored-history transformation, protocol-action observation, or when reviewing changes that add code to AgentSideEffects or AgentService.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.