Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gejyn14/kiwoom-plugin --skill portfolio-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gejyn14/kiwoom-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gejyn14/kiwoom-plugin/portfolio-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gejyn14/kiwoom-plugin/portfolio-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gejyn14/kiwoom-plugin/portfolio-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gejyn14/kiwoom-plugin/portfolio-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gejyn14/kiwoom-plugin/portfolio-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.00746 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00030 | $0.00298 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
portfolio-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
계좌 점검
순서
-
잔고와 보유종목 —
kiwoom_run(["account","balance","--market","kr"])미국주식은--market us, 둘 다는 생략한다. -
실현손익 —
kiwoom_run(["account","pnl","daily","--from","<YYYYMMDD>","--to","<YYYYMMDD>"])account pnl은 그룹이다.--from/--to가 필수이므로 기간을 정해서 넣는다 (기간을 안 물었으면 최근 한 달 정도를 쓰고, 어떤 기간인지 답에 밝힌다). 종목별로 보려면account pnl by-period --from … --to …, 당일 한 종목은account pnl today <코드>. -
미체결 —
kiwoom_run(["account","orders","pending"])체결되지 않은 주문이 남아 있으면 사용자가 잊고 있을 수 있으니 먼저 알린다. 체결된 것은account orders executed. -
필요하면 예수금(
account deposit), 거래내역(account history transactions), 당일 매매일지(account history journal)를 더한다.
한 화면 요약이 필요하면 kiwoom_run(["dashboard"]) 하나로 계좌 요약과
거래량 상위를 함께 받을 수 있다.
답할 때
- 평가손익과 실현손익을 섞지 않는다. 1번의 평가손익은 유가잔고평가액에서 총매입금액을 뺀 계산된 값(아직 팔지 않은 것)이고, 2번의 실현손익은 실제로 팔아서 확정된 것이다. 사용자가 증권사 앱과 숫자가 다르다고 하면 대개 이 차이다 — 어느 쪽을 말하는 것인지 밝히고 답한다.
- 집중도를 짚는다. 한 종목이 포트폴리오의 큰 부분을 차지하면 언급할 가치가 있다. 다만 사실을 말하는 것이지 조언이 아니다.
meta.partial_failures를 확인한다. 국내/미국 중 한쪽만 실패하면 이 키가 생긴다.null이 "그 계좌가 없다"인지 "조회가 깨졌다"인지 구별해서 보고한다. 한쪽이 실패했는데 성공한 것처럼 요약하지 않는다.meta.env가"mock"이면 모의투자 계좌다. 실계좌 잔고로 오해하지 않도록 명시한다.
계좌가 비어 보일 때
먼저 meta.env와 프로필을 확인한다 — 모의투자 계좌를 보고 있거나 다른 프로필로
조회했을 수 있다. kiwoom_run(["auth","status"])로 어떤 프로필·도메인인지
확인할 수 있다.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 48 lines · 74 tokens per session scan A 3933d36b0051
portfolio-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository gejyn14/kiwoom-plugin (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 746 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
portfolio-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| portfolio-reviewgejyn14/kiwoom-plugin | Skill | 1 | 3mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 74 | Claude Code |
| sector-rotationHKUDS/Vibe-Trading | Skill | 38k | today | MIT | A | 39 | Claude Code, Codex |
| strategy-pivot-designertradermonty/claude-trading-skills | Skill | 3.7k | today | MIT | A | 28 | Claude Code, Codex |
| twitter-readerhimself65/finance-skills | Skill | 3.5k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 110 | Claude Code |
| energy-procurementhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-plugins | Skill | 1.5k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 93 | Claude Code, Codex |
| airdrop-hunting-guidenirholas/three.ws | Skill | 269 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 54 | Claude Code, Codex |
| multi-expert-analyzerdigoal/blog | Skill | 8.6k | 4d ago | GPL-2.0 | A | 292 | Codex |