Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/generous-corp/pulp/handoffnpx skills add Generous-Corp/pulp --skill handoffgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Generous-Corp/pulpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/generous-corp/pulp/handoff)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/generous-corp/pulp/handoff"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/generous-corp/pulp/handoff.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00107 | $0.03440 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.01720 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00688 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00344 |
Grade A, and why
handoff scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 240 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
handoff
Turn "coordinate a handoff" into three artifacts: a status doc committed to
pulp-planning main, a simple goal prompt that links it, and a list of
open items for the next session to track. The point is a fresh session — often
on a different machine, with none of this conversation's context — can start cold
and finish the work.
Keep the goal short (one or two sentences + a link + the issue numbers). Put all the detail in the doc. A goal the user pastes should fit in a glance; the doc is where the elaboration lives.
Carry the original ask forward faithfully — this is the #1 job. A handoff exists to hand off the goal the user actually gave, not a reconstruction of it. A handoff most often happens mid-project, and the failure mode is quietly narrowing the goal to "whatever's left in flight," or paraphrasing it into something subtly different from what was asked. Guard against both:
- Rediscover the last-known goal before writing anything. Prefer the goal as
it was captured — the user's own words. Look, in order, for: a persisted goal
record (a
planning/*-goal.mdor the "original ask" block of a prior handoff doc), the standing objective the session was given (e.g. a Claude Code/goalor the opening prompt), and the earliest user messages that framed the project. Quote it; don't restyle it. - If it was never captured, reconstruct it faithfully and then persist it in the doc's "original ask" block, marked as a reconstruction — so the next handoff rediscovers a real record instead of reconstructing again. Each handoff should make the goal more durable, not drift it further.
- Fidelity over polish — no invented scope. Do not add scope, sharpen vague asks into crisp requirements, or merge in your own opinion of what "should" be done. If the ask was "build this planning file until it's all done," the handoff says exactly that — not a reworded, expanded brief. A handoff is translation, not a fresh review: never turn "carry this plan to the new machine" into "re-plan the project." When unsure whether a requirement was in the ask, mark it inferred, not stated.
- Source from the original documents. Point at the plan/spec/issue/goal the user actually wrote and quote it; do not substitute your own summary as the record. If the original lives somewhere ephemeral (a scratch plan, in-session goal text), copy it verbatim into the durable goal record so it survives.
- Capture honest evolution, kept distinct. Goals do grow — the user adds scope as work proceeds. Capture those additions too, but separate "original ask" from "added later" (with when/where each came from) so the record stays honest and no one can't tell invented scope from real scope. Only include an addition the user actually made; never one you think would be good.
- The remaining tasks/issues are how the objective is tracked, never a redefinition of it. "Do all of X; here's the part still undone" — never "do the three tickets that happen to be open."
Capture the goal at ask-time (the durable fix). The reliable way to hand off a goal is to have written it down when it was given. When a user sets a project goal or standing objective, persist it verbatim to a durable, agent-neutral, machine-portable place (a planning goal file) so any later session — Claude or Codex, any machine — can rediscover the last known goal without depending on one CLI's memory or slash-command state. The handoff is the fallback when that wasn't done; the capture is the fix.
Reference, don't duplicate. The doc is a map to the work, not a copy of it. Anything already captured in another artifact — a plan/spec, an ADR, a GitHub issue, a commit message, a diff, an existing skill — gets linked by path or URL, never re-pasted. Re-leverage the docs the work already produced. A handoff that restates a tracking issue's item list drifts from it the moment the issue is edited; one that links the issue stays correct for free. The doc's own content is only what exists nowhere else: the current honest status, which tracker to drive vs monitor, the working pattern, and the traps this work paid for.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 240 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A 137a7569f5c2
handoff is a skill published in the GitHub repository Generous-Corp/pulp (16 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 3,440 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-platform-rag-engine-management
Manage and query Agent Platform RAG Engine Corpora and retrieve grounded contexts using the Google GenAI SDK. Use when listing RAG corpora or files, inspecting a corpus, retrieving contexts, or generating content grounded in a RAG corpus. Do not use for standard database queries (use SQL/Spanner skills), Google…
agent-platform-model-registry
Agent Platform Model Registry Management. Use when you need to upload, list, describe, update, or delete machine learning models (and their versions) in the Agent Platform Model Registry. Don't use for model training, model deployment to endpoints, or managing non-Agent Platform models.
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
google-cloud-solution-agentic-analytics-spark-knowledge-catalog
Discovers requirements and generates guidance to design and deploy a governed, secure agentic-analytics solution for data that's distributed across Google Cloud, other cloud providers, or on-premises. Data that's outside Google Cloud (such as data from Databricks, Snowflake, Salesforce, SAP, or Oracle systems) is…
training-check
Interactively monitor training metrics from the current Codex session, periodically checking WandB or fallback logs for NaN, divergence, plateaus, and broken runs.
nemo-automodel-launcher-config
Configure NeMo AutoModel job launches for interactive runs, Slurm clusters, and SkyPilot cloud execution.