Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills --skill github-prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills/github-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills/github-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills/github-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills/github-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gentleman-programming/gentleman-skills/github-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00034 | $0.00969 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
github-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 211 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When to Use
- Creating a new Pull Request
- Writing PR titles and descriptions
- Preparing commits for review
- Using
gh pr createcommand
Critical Patterns
PR Title = Conventional Commit
<type>(<scope>): <short description>
feat New feature
fix Bug fix
docs Documentation
refactor Code refactoring
test Adding tests
chore Maintenance
PR Description Structure
## Summary
- 1-3 bullet points explaining WHAT and WHY
## Changes
- List main changes
## Testing
- [ ] Tests added/updated
- [ ] Manual testing done
Closes #123
Atomic Commits
# Good: One thing per commit
git commit -m "feat(user): add User model"
git commit -m "feat(user): add UserService"
git commit -m "test(user): add UserService tests"
# Bad: Everything in one commit
git commit -m "add user feature"
Code Examples
Basic PR Creation
gh pr create \
--title "feat(auth): add OAuth2 login" \
--body "## Summary
- Add Google OAuth2 authentication
## Changes
- Added AuthProvider component
- Created useAuth hook
Closes #42"
PR with HEREDOC (Complex Description)
gh pr create --title "feat(dashboard): add analytics" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- Add real-time analytics dashboard
## Changes
- Created AnalyticsProvider
- Added LineChart, BarChart components
## Testing
- [x] Unit tests for components
- [x] Manual testing complete
## Screenshots

Closes #123
EOF
)"
Draft PR
gh pr create --draft \
--title "wip: refactor auth" \
--body "Work in progress"
PR with Reviewers and Labels
gh pr create \
--title "feat(api): add rate limiting" \
--body "Adds rate limiting to API" \
--reviewer "user1,user2" \
--label "enhancement,api"
Commands
# Create PR
gh pr create --title "type(scope): desc" --body "..."
# Create with web editor
gh pr create --web
# View PR status
gh pr status
# View diff
gh pr diff
# Check CI status
gh pr checks
# Merge with squash
gh pr merge --squash
# Add reviewer
gh pr edit --add-reviewer username
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 211 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A 3d6b67e0a360
github-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository Gentleman-Programming/Gentleman-Skills (661 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 969 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
create-pr
Creates a GitHub PR with a Linear-ticket-prefixed title and a decision-led, narrative description for Prisma 8. Use when the user wants to create a pull request, open a PR, or submit changes for review.
git-commit
Generate well-formatted git commit messages following conventional commit standards.
repo-sync
Manage automatic Git syncing on macOS with repo-sync. Use only when the user explicitly invokes /repo-sync.
engineer-bot-ops
A workflow for carrying an engineering task from scope through implementation and reviewable delivery. It works with a repository's branch, existing changes, rules, checks, and permissions while separating completed, unverified, and next-step work.
mcore-split-pr
Split a PR into multiple PRs to reduce the number of required CODEOWNERS reviewer groups.
contributing
How to contribute to evlog, covering commit and PR conventions, changesets, the Definition of Done, testing rules, and the authored skills that walk through building a new adapter, enricher, framework integration, or map rule. Load this for any question about contributing, opening a PR, or adding something to the…