Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/geonheeye/multi-agent-dotfiles/systematic-debuggingnpx skills add GeonheeYe/multi-agent-dotfiles --skill systematic-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GeonheeYe/multi-agent-dotfilesWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.02287 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01144 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00457 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
systematic-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
10 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 297 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 4999cb851360
systematic-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository GeonheeYe/multi-agent-dotfiles (3 stars, last pushed 13d ago), with no licence file. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 2,287 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-all
Use when the user asks for a deep review, full review, comprehensive review, production readiness assessment, full audit, multi-domain audit, "security and reliability and code review", or "review everything". Also use when the user explicitly requests performance review alongside the comprehensive request (e.g.…
review-security
Perform a security review using STRIDE threat modeling, OWASP Top 10 analysis, and automated scanning (gosec, govulncheck). Use when the user asks for a security review, threat model, OWASP analysis, or security audit.
active-review
Use when the user wants to prepare for a manual PR code review and asks for help targeting it — a terse PR summary, ranked files to read first, and paste-ready inline comment drafts with GitHub deep-links. Triggers: "active review this PR", "walk me through this PR", "help me review this", "give me inline comments to…
audit-accomplishments
Use when preparing a performance self-reflection, midyear or annual review, promotion packet, or brag document; when asked to collect, mine, gather, or summarize your accomplishments, contributions, or impact over a period; or when assembling cited evidence of work done across GitHub, Jira, Notion, Slack, and local…
audit-history
Use when reviewing past agent sessions, auditing memory health, identifying repeated corrections or friction, cleaning up stale memories, proposing new skills and rules from usage patterns, or identifying mechanical improvements (testing, linting, static analysis, tooling) that could improve outcomes.
evaluate-dependency
Use when adding or evaluating a project dependency in any language, phrases like "should I use X library", "evaluate ", "what library for Y", or when reviewing a PR that touches a manifest (go.mod, package.json, requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, Cargo.toml, Gemfile, mix.exs, composer.json). Also use when comparing…