Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir --skill oban-thinkinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixirWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir/oban-thinking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir/oban-thinking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir/oban-thinking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir/oban-thinking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir/oban-thinking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00088 | $0.02277 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00035 | $0.00911 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00455 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
oban-thinking scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 326 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Oban Thinking
Paradigm shifts for Oban job processing. These insights prevent common bugs and guide proper patterns.
Part 1: Oban (Non-Pro)
The Iron Law: JSON Serialization
JOB ARGS ARE JSON. ATOMS BECOME STRINGS.
This single fact causes most Oban debugging headaches.
# Creating - atom keys are fine
MyWorker.new(%{user_id: 123})
# Processing - must use string keys (JSON converted atoms to strings)
def perform(%Oban.Job{args: %{"user_id" => user_id}}) do
# ...
end
Error Handling: Let It Crash
Don't catch errors in Oban jobs. Let them bubble up to Oban for proper handling.
Why?
- Automatic logging: Oban logs the full error with stacktrace
- Automatic retries: Jobs retry with exponential backoff
- Visibility: Failed jobs appear in Oban Web dashboard
- Consistency: Error states are tracked in the database
Anti-Pattern
# Bad: Swallowing errors
def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
case do_work(job.args) do
{:ok, result} -> {:ok, result}
{:error, reason} ->
Logger.error("Failed: #{reason}")
{:ok, :failed} # Silently marks as complete!
end
end
Correct Pattern
# Good: Let errors propagate
def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
result = do_work!(job.args) # Raises on failure
{:ok, result}
end
# Or return error tuple - Oban treats as failure
def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
case do_work(job.args) do
{:ok, result} -> {:ok, result}
{:error, reason} -> {:error, reason} # Oban will retry
end
end
When to Catch Errors
Only catch errors when you need custom retry logic or want to mark a job as permanently failed:
def perform(%Oban.Job{} = job) do
case external_api_call(job.args) do
{:ok, result} -> {:ok, result}
{:error, :not_found} -> {:cancel, :resource_not_found} # Don't retry
{:error, :rate_limited} -> {:snooze, 60} # Retry in 60 seconds
{:error, _} -> {:error, :will_retry} # Normal retry
end
end
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 326 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 777844450350
oban-thinking is a skill published in the GitHub repository georgeguimaraes/claude-code-elixir (168 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 2,277 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
phoenix
Use when building an Elixir web app with Phoenix — contexts, Ecto schemas, changesets and migrations, LiveView, channels and PubSub, the generators, and the boundary between domain logic and the web layer. Covers the classic LiveView over-rendering and Ecto N+1 traps. NOT pure OTP work with no web or Ecto layer …
elixir-expert
Expert-level Elixir, Phoenix, OTP, and concurrent systems. Use when the user mentions Phoenix, OTP, Erlang, concurrent, or functional, or when the task involves Elixir Fundamentals or Phoenix Framework.
koko
Develop and extend Koko — the Elixir/OTP agent living alongside joelclaw. Covers OTP patterns, Redis bridge protocol, shadow execution, and workload implementation.
flow-next-impl-review
Carmack-level implementation review of changes via the configured backend. Use when asked to review code or a diff in a flow-next repo.
flow-next-resolve-pr
Resolve PR review feedback. Fetches unresolved threads, triages, fixes, replies and resolves via GraphQL. Use when asked to address review comments.
elixir
Use when writing or refactoring Elixir/OTP on the BEAM — GenServers, supervision trees and restart strategies, pattern matching, mix projects and releases — or when processes misbehave (restart loops, mailbox growth, call timeouts). NOT a Phoenix web app, LiveView, Ecto or channels (that is phoenix).