Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev --skill analise-probatoriagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/analise-probatoria)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/analise-probatoria"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/analise-probatoria/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/analise-probatoria"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev/analise-probatoria.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.04250 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.02125 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00850 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00425 |
Grade A, and why
analise-probatoria scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 286 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<quando_usar> <ativar_quando> - Usuário pede para "analisar provas" ou "avaliar qualidade probatória" - Usuário menciona "prova testemunhal", "depoimento", "testemunha" - Usuário menciona "confissão", "interrogatório", "falsa confissão" - Usuário menciona "laudo pericial", "perícia", "assistente técnico" - Usuário menciona "prova digital", "print de WhatsApp", "evidência eletrônica" - Usuário menciona "reconhecimento de pessoas", "reconhecimento fotográfico" - Usuário menciona "prova documental", "documento", "falsidade" - Usuário quer "inventário probatório" ou "mapa de provas" - Usuário precisa avaliar "credibilidade" ou "confiabilidade" de provas - Contexto de decisão judicial que exige valoração probatória fundamentada </ativar_quando>
<nao_usar_quando> - Análise causal probabilística com redes bayesianas (usar agente Pearl) - Análise foundherentista de coerência epistêmica (usar agente Haack) - Análise probatória penal com standard de absolvição por dúvida razoável (usar agente FBD) - Pesquisa de jurisprudência sobre direito probatório (usar pipeline-pesquisa) - Elaboração de sentença ou decisão (usar pipeline-sentenca) </nao_usar_quando> </quando_usar>
Carregar APENAS os tipos presentes no processo (economia de contexto).
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 286 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 2a7c35581abc
analise-probatoria is a skill published in the GitHub repository georgemarmelstein/superjurista-dev (22 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 4,250 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…