Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add getcrew44/crew44 --skill finishing-a-development-branchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getcrew44/crew44Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/getcrew44/crew44/finishing-a-development-branch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getcrew44/crew44/finishing-a-development-branch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getcrew44/crew44/finishing-a-development-branch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getcrew44/crew44/finishing-a-development-branch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getcrew44/crew44/finishing-a-development-branch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.01791 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00896 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00358 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
finishing-a-development-branch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to finishing-a-development-branch — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 252 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.
Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
The Process
Step 1: Verify Tests
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
If tests fail:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.
Step 2: Detect Environment
Determine workspace state before presenting options:
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:
| State | Menu | Cleanup |
|---|---|---|
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo) |
Standard 4 options | No worktree to clean up |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branch |
Standard 4 options | Provenance-based (see Step 6) |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEAD |
Reduced 3 options (no merge) | No cleanup (externally managed) |
Step 3: Determine Base Branch
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"
Step 4: Present Options
Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 4 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work
Which option?
Detached HEAD — present exactly these 3 options:
Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).
1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)
3. Discard this work
Which option?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 252 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 5c8d4b59aedb
finishing-a-development-branch is a skill published in the GitHub repository getcrew44/crew44 (359 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,791 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to finishing-a-development-branch, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
github
A general GitHub skill for understanding repositories, pull requests, and issues through a connected GitHub account. It helps route work to more specific GitHub workflows when needed.
yeet
Publish local changes to GitHub by confirming scope, committing intentionally, pushing the branch, and opening a draft PR through the GitHub app from this plugin, with gh used only as a fallback where connector coverage is insufficient.
gh-address-comments
Help address review/issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI; verify gh auth first and prompt the user to authenticate if not logged in.
gitlab
Read and manage GitLab projects, issues, merge requests, and pipelines via the GitLab REST API. Use when the user asks about GitLab projects, issues, MRs, or pipelines.
npm
Publish and manage packages on the npm registry (npmjs.com), publish, dist-tags, deprecate, owners, download stats, private installs. Use when the user asks to publish, release or manage an npm package, or to inspect the registry.
mine-plan-exec
Execute one repository implementation plan end to end in its MINE-prepared linked worktree. Use when the user invokes mine-plan-exec with a plan ID or file, asks to implement a governed plan, or wants dependency checks, code changes, verification, reporting, commits, and graph updates. Never implement directly on…