Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gethouston/houston --skill avaliar-um-fornecedorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gethouston/houstonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gethouston/houston/avaliar-um-fornecedor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gethouston/houston/avaliar-um-fornecedor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gethouston/houston/avaliar-um-fornecedor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gethouston/houston/avaliar-um-fornecedor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gethouston/houston/avaliar-um-fornecedor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00084 | $0.03098 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.01549 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00620 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00310 |
Grade A, and why
avaliar-um-fornecedor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Avaliar Um Fornecedor
Uma skill para due diligence de fornecedores. O parâmetro aspect escolhe o ângulo: uma avaliação de encaixe comercial contra o seu critério de fornecedores, ou um relatório de pesquisa de compliance com fontes públicas. Os dois se baseiam no seu contexto operacional para que os limites de risco correspondam à sua postura.
Parâmetro: aspect
fit- due diligence comercial baseada em critérios. Dá nota de 1 a 10 ao fornecedor contra seu critério, atribui nível de risco (verde / amarelo / vermelho), mostra pontos fortes, preocupações, perguntas para a primeira ligação, e uma recomendação. Saída:evaluations/{supplier-slug}.md.compliance- pesquisa de compliance com fontes públicas. Cataloga os frameworks alegados, triangula com verificação independente, identifica os responsáveis pela segurança, lista incidentes dos últimos 3 anos. Cada afirmação vem com fonte. Saída:compliance-reports/{company-slug}.md.
O usuário nomeia o aspect em linguagem simples ("avalie a Stripe", "a Vercel é um bom encaixe", "verificação de compliance na Mongo", "a Notion está limpa") -> eu infiro. Ambíguo -> pergunto UMA pergunta nomeando as duas opções.
Quando usar
fit:
- "avalie {fornecedor} para {produto / serviço}"
- "dê nota a esses fornecedores segundo nossos critérios"
- "{fornecedor} é um bom encaixe para {nosso caso de uso}"
- Chamado de
score-an-inboundquando o inbound é uma candidatura de fornecedor.
compliance:
- "rode due diligence de compliance na {fornecedor}"
- "a postura de compliance da {empresa} é real"
- "quais frameworks a {fornecedor} realmente tem"
- Chamado como sub-etapa de
aspect=fitpara fornecedores sensíveis a risco (processadores de dados, infraestrutura, serviços financeiros).
Conexões que eu preciso
Eu executo trabalho externo através do Composio. Antes desta skill rodar eu verifico se as categorias abaixo estão conectadas. Faltando -> eu nomeio a categoria, peço para você conectar na aba Integrações, e paro.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 151 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 4aae551644de
avaliar-um-fornecedor is a skill published in the GitHub repository gethouston/houston (113 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 3,098 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…