Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gethouston/houston --skill avaliar-uma-proposta-recebidagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gethouston/houstonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gethouston/houston/avaliar-uma-proposta-recebida)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gethouston/houston/avaliar-uma-proposta-recebida"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gethouston/houston/avaliar-uma-proposta-recebida/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gethouston/houston/avaliar-uma-proposta-recebida"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gethouston/houston/avaliar-uma-proposta-recebida.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.01570 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00052 | $0.00785 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00314 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00157 |
Grade A, and why
avaliar-uma-proposta-recebida scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Avaliar uma proposta recebida
Motor genérico de rubrica de aprovação para qualquer proposta recebida que precise de decisão do fundador. Triagem específica de fornecedor → habilidade vet-a-vendor (critérios de compras, pasta diferente).
Quando usar
- "avalie esta candidatura de fornecedor contra nossos critérios" (específico de fornecedor →
vet-a-vendor). - "avalie estes candidatos a advisor".
- "essa parceria faz sentido".
- "devo aceitar essa solicitação de imprensa".
- "rode o fluxo de aprovação nisso".
Conexões que eu preciso
Eu executo trabalho externo através do Composio. Antes desta habilidade rodar, eu verifico se as categorias abaixo estão conectadas. Faltando → eu nomeio a categoria, peço para você conectar na aba Integrações, e paro.
- Pesquisa na web (Exa, Perplexity, Firecrawl) - Obrigatório. Extrai sinais públicos sobre quem enviou para verificar afirmações e identificar alertas.
- Caixa de entrada (Gmail, Outlook) - Opcional. Permite que eu confira correspondência anterior com quem enviou para a recomendação refletir o histórico.
Se nenhum provedor de pesquisa na web estiver conectado, eu paro e peço para você conectar um provedor de pesquisa primeiro.
Informações que eu preciso
Eu leio o seu contexto operacional primeiro. Para cada campo obrigatório que estiver faltando, eu faço UMA pergunta em linguagem simples (melhor modalidade: app conectado > arquivo enviado > URL > colar) e espero.
- A proposta em si - Obrigatório. Por que eu preciso: eu avalio o que está na minha frente. Se estiver faltando, eu pergunto: "Envie a proposta, pitch, candidatura, solicitação, ou cole a troca de e-mails."
- Rubrica de aprovação - Obrigatório. Por que eu preciso: avaliação ad-hoc não é reproduzível. Se estiver faltando, eu pergunto: "Quais critérios eu devo usar? Cole eles, ou diga 'padrão' e eu salvo uma rubrica inicial para este tipo de proposta que você pode editar depois."
- Prioridades ativas - Obrigatório. Por que eu preciso: a pontuação de encaixe com prioridades depende delas. Se estiver faltando, eu pergunto: "Quais são as 2 a 3 coisas que a empresa está priorizando neste trimestre?"
- Limites inegociáveis - Opcional. Por que eu preciso: permite recusar de cara qualquer coisa que os viole. Se você não tiver isso, eu sigo em frente com dado pendente usando os padrões do workspace.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 94 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A c27710968d55
avaliar-uma-proposta-recebida is a skill published in the GitHub repository gethouston/houston (113 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 1,570 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…