Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gethouston/houston --skill evaluar-un-proveedorgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gethouston/houstonWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gethouston/houston/evaluar-un-proveedor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gethouston/houston/evaluar-un-proveedor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gethouston/houston/evaluar-un-proveedor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gethouston/houston/evaluar-un-proveedor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gethouston/houston/evaluar-un-proveedor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00090 | $0.03092 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01546 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00618 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00309 |
Grade A, and why
evaluar-un-proveedor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evaluar un proveedor
Una sola habilidad para la debida diligencia de proveedores. El parámetro aspect elige el ángulo: una evaluación de encaje comercial contra tu rúbrica de proveedores, o un informe de investigación de cumplimiento con fuentes públicas. Ambos se basan en tu contexto operativo para que los umbrales de riesgo coincidan con tu postura.
Parámetro: aspect
fit- debida diligencia comercial basada en rúbrica. Califica al proveedor del 1 al 10 contra tu rúbrica, asigna un nivel de riesgo (verde / amarillo / rojo), muestra fortalezas, preocupaciones, preguntas para la primera llamada y una recomendación. Salida:evaluations/{supplier-slug}.md.compliance- investigación de cumplimiento con fuentes públicas. Cataloga los marcos de referencia que afirma tener, los triangula contra verificación independiente, identifica a los responsables de seguridad y enumera incidentes de los últimos 3 años. Cada afirmación está citada. Salida:compliance-reports/{company-slug}.md.
Tú nombras el aspecto en lenguaje sencillo ("evalúa a Stripe", "¿Vercel es un buen encaje?", "verificación de cumplimiento de Mongo", "¿Notion está limpio?") -> lo infiero. Si es ambiguo, hago UNA pregunta que nombre ambas opciones.
Cuándo usarla
fit:
- "evalúa a {proveedor} para {producto / servicio}"
- "califica a estos proveedores según nuestros criterios"
- "¿{proveedor} es un buen encaje para {nuestro caso de uso}?"
- Invocada desde
score-an-inboundcuando la propuesta entrante es de un proveedor.
compliance:
- "haz una debida diligencia de cumplimiento sobre {proveedor}"
- "¿la postura de cumplimiento de {empresa} es real?"
- "qué marcos de referencia tiene realmente {proveedor}"
- Invocada como subpaso de
aspect=fitpara proveedores sensibles al riesgo (procesadores de datos, infraestructura, servicios financieros).
Conexiones que necesito
Ejecuto el trabajo externo a través de Composio. Antes de correr esta habilidad verifico que las categorías de abajo estén vinculadas. Si falta alguna, nombro la categoría, te pido conectarla desde la pestaña de Integraciones y me detengo.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 151 lines · 90 tokens per session scan A 7fb4c4a8e155
evaluar-un-proveedor is a skill published in the GitHub repository gethouston/houston (113 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 90 tokens to every session and 3,092 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…