Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/getlytos/lytos-cli/securitynpx skills add getlytos/lytos-cli --skill securitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getlytos/lytos-cliWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00059 | $0.02589 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01295 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00518 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00259 |
Grade A, and why
security scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
const output = execSync(`ls ${userInput}`); How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 357 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill — Security
This skill defines how to handle security on a project using Lytos. An agent loaded with this skill knows how to identify vulnerabilities, apply secure coding patterns, and enforce security best practices across any language.
When to invoke this skill
- When writing code that handles user input, authentication, or authorization
- During a code review — check for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities
- When adding dependencies — audit for known vulnerabilities
- When configuring servers, APIs, or deployment pipelines
- After a security incident — fix the flaw and harden the surrounding code
Procedure
1. OWASP Top 10 — common vulnerabilities
For each vulnerability, know the bad pattern and the fix.
Injection (SQL, command)
# BAD — SQL injection
query = f"SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = '{user_input}'"
cursor.execute(query)
# GOOD — parameterized query
cursor.execute("SELECT * FROM users WHERE name = %s", (user_input,))
// BAD — command injection
const output = execSync(`ls ${userInput}`);
// GOOD — avoid shell, pass args as array
const output = execFileSync('ls', [userInput]);
Broken authentication
# BAD — MD5 for passwords
import hashlib
hashed = hashlib.md5(password.encode()).hexdigest()
# GOOD — bcrypt with salt
import bcrypt
hashed = bcrypt.hashpw(password.encode(), bcrypt.gensalt())
// BAD — plain comparison, timing attack
if (token === storedToken) { /* ... */ }
// GOOD — constant-time comparison
const crypto = require('crypto');
if (crypto.timingSafeEqual(Buffer.from(token), Buffer.from(storedToken))) { /* ... */ }
Sensitive data exposure
// BAD — logging sensitive data
log.Printf("User login: email=%s password=%s", email, password)
// GOOD — never log secrets
log.Printf("User login: email=%s", email)
// BAD — exposing stack traces to the user
ini_set('display_errors', 1);
// GOOD — log errors, show generic message
ini_set('display_errors', 0);
ini_set('log_errors', 1);
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 357 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 8c6238153cf6
security is a skill published in the GitHub repository getlytos/lytos-cli (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 2,589 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…