Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add getmcpm/cli --skill nestedgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getmcpm/cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/getmcpm/cli/nested)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getmcpm/cli/nested"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getmcpm/cli/nested/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getmcpm/cli/nested"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getmcpm/cli/nested.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00006 | $0.00017 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00007 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00003 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00002 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Supporting content only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 6 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A f691b61311f5
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository getmcpm/cli (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 17 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-09.
review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reviewgetmcpm/cli | Skill | 3 | yesterday | MIT | A | 6 | Claude Code, Codex |
| pipefy-toolkit-setuppipefy/ai-toolkit | Skill | 53 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 86 | Claude Code |
| checkkiruxich/legitAgent | Skill | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 63 | Cursor |
| fixkiruxich/legitAgent | Skill | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 41 | Cursor |
| scan-urlkiruxich/legitAgent | Skill | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 42 | Cursor |
| generate-policykiruxich/legitAgent | Skill | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 36 | Cursor |
| scankiruxich/legitAgent | Skill | 2 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 40 | Cursor |