Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to getsentry/toolkit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/getsentry/toolkit/main/.agents/skills/logging-observability/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getsentry/toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/getsentry/toolkit/logging-observability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getsentry/toolkit/logging-observability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getsentry/toolkit/logging-observability/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getsentry/toolkit/logging-observability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getsentry/toolkit/logging-observability.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.02526 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.01010 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00505 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00253 |
Grade A, and why
logging-observability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 304 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A 2f780f6b5265
logging-observability is a skill published in the GitHub repository getsentry/toolkit (929 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 2,526 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-14.
Other skills, from other repositories
printing-press-output-review
Internal sub-skill: agentic review of a printed CLI's sampled command output for plausibility issues that rule-based checks can't encode (substring-match relevance, format bugs, silent source drops, ranking failures). Invoked via the Skill tool by the main printing-press skill at Phase 4.85 and printing-press-polish…
audit
Fast quality gate — detects stack, runs static analysis, checks cross-layer consistency, fixes issues. Run between every pipeline phase, before every commit push, after every feature batch. Lighter than /analyze but catches the same critical issues.
logic-lens
AI-powered Claude Code skill that performs deep code review using formal logic and reasoning frameworks to detect bugs, anti-patterns, and security risks beyond what linters catch.
fix
Resolve blocking review gaps through bounded repairs and independent re-review; diagnose stalled attempts without expanding scope.
kn-doc
Use when working with Knowns documentation - viewing, searching, creating, or updating docs.
shadow-verify
Dispatch a parallel adversarial verifier wave after any high-stakes sub-agent investigation (code reviews, audits, findings reports, large refactors, gap analyses) — or whenever a sub-agent asserts a claim with high-confidence language, since confidence is a trigger, not a verdict. Use when sub-agent output will drive…