Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-reviewnpx skills add getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP --skill xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getsentry/XcodeBuildMCPWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00033 | $0.00420 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
XcodeBuildMCP Docs Command Review
Review changed changelog entries for CLI command references that would mislead users or agents.
What to inspect
CHANGELOG.mdmanifests/tools/*.yamlandmanifests/workflows/*.yamlwhen you need to verify current CLI workflow/tool namessrc/cli/**only when command wiring is unclear from manifests
Issue criteria
Report a finding only when a command reference is presented as current guidance and appears invalid for the current CLI surface.
High severity
- A changelog bullet, example, or migration instruction tells users to run a removed or invalid
xcodebuildmcpcommand as the current path. - A Breaking change mentions a removed command but does not give a valid replacement.
- A command reference uses the wrong workflow/tool pairing in a way a user or agent would likely copy.
Medium severity
- A command reference is ambiguous enough that users may not know whether it is historical or current.
- A migration example gives the right replacement but does not clearly label the old command as "Before", "old", "removed", or equivalent.
Explicitly allowed
Do not report removed commands when they are clearly historical context, especially in:
- Breaking-change migration sections
- "Before" examples paired with valid "After" examples
- Already-released changelog sections describing past behavior
Example that should not be reported:
Before:
xcodebuildmcp logging start-sim-log-cap
After:
xcodebuildmcp simulator build-and-run
Output
For each finding, include:
- Severity
- File and line
- The command reference
- Why it reads as current guidance
- Suggested replacement wording or command
If all command references are historical or valid, report no findings.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 61 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 9a23ca46c95a
xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP (6,316 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 420 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
opik-diagnose
Surface the Opik traces worth a developer's attention, ranked by signal — errors, failed tool calls, latency, regressions, and low online-eval scores — plus Diagnostics issues. Reads live/production traces via the SDK (searchtraces and agentinsights) and works with no MCP; uses the MCP issue entity when connected.…
client-scripts
Write ServiceNow client scripts (onLoad/onChange/onSubmit/onCellEdit) using gform, guser, GlideAjax, field visibility/mandatory toggles, and validation with debounced server calls.
agoragentic-transaction-assurance
Prepare, evaluate, and reconcile autonomous agent transactions without self-granting payment or owner authority. Use when an agent must bind principal authority, seller terms, payment evidence, execution, delivered outcome, and reconciliation; handle paid retries safely; or prepare an authority request for owner…
linkding
Manage bookmarks with Linkding. Use when the user asks to "save a bookmark", "add link", "search bookmarks", "list my bookmarks", "find saved links", "tag a bookmark", "archive bookmark", "check if URL is saved", "list tags", "create bundle", or mentions Linkding bookmark management.
maya-shot-export
Pipeline stage — shot-level export: frame ranges, cameras, FBX / Alembic packaging for editorial. Use when packaging shot data for downstream departments. Not for full pipeline publish (maya-pipeline) or scene assembly (maya-scene-assembly).
daily-task-prep
Morning preparation. Calendar lookahead, meeting context loading, open threads from yesterday, active task review. Extends briefing with actionable prep.