XcodeBuildMCP: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review/SKILL.md

xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review is a skill for Claude Code from getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP. It costs 33 tokens per session (420 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review checklist for checking whether XcodeBuildMCP changelog entries contain valid current command-line instructions. Historical migration examples are allowed when clearly labelled.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect changelog command references against the current manifests and, when needed, the command-line implementation.
Why use it?
It helps prevent users from copying removed commands or confusing old and current command names.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on XcodeBuildMCP itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything XcodeBuildMCP configures →

About the project

XcodeBuildMCP is an MCP server and command-line tool that gives coding agents tools for building and working on iOS and macOS projects. It supports workflows involving Xcode and xcodebuild, including project builds and device-related operations. Its catalogue add-ons provide agent instructions and connections for using the MCP server and CLI.

getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP · 6,506 stars · on GitHub · xcodebuildmcp.com

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP/main/.agents/skills/xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getsentry/xcodebuildmcp/xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 33 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 420 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00033 $0.00420
Opus 5.5 $0.00013 $0.00168
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00084
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00042

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 9a23ca46c95a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review/SKILL.md · 61 lines

What it actually says

XcodeBuildMCP Docs Command Review

Review changed changelog entries for CLI command references that would mislead users or agents.

What to inspect

  • CHANGELOG.md
  • manifests/tools/*.yaml and manifests/workflows/*.yaml when you need to verify current CLI workflow/tool names
  • src/cli/** only when command wiring is unclear from manifests

Issue criteria

Report a finding only when a command reference is presented as current guidance and appears invalid for the current CLI surface.

High severity

  • A changelog bullet, example, or migration instruction tells users to run a removed or invalid xcodebuildmcp command as the current path.
  • A Breaking change mentions a removed command but does not give a valid replacement.
  • A command reference uses the wrong workflow/tool pairing in a way a user or agent would likely copy.

Medium severity

  • A command reference is ambiguous enough that users may not know whether it is historical or current.
  • A migration example gives the right replacement but does not clearly label the old command as "Before", "old", "removed", or equivalent.

Explicitly allowed

Do not report removed commands when they are clearly historical context, especially in:

  • Breaking-change migration sections
  • "Before" examples paired with valid "After" examples
  • Already-released changelog sections describing past behavior

Example that should not be reported:

Before:
xcodebuildmcp logging start-sim-log-cap

After:
xcodebuildmcp simulator build-and-run

Output

For each finding, include:

  • Severity
  • File and line
  • The command reference
  • Why it reads as current guidance
  • Suggested replacement wording or command

If all command references are historical or valid, report no findings.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 9a23ca46c95a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

xcodebuildmcp-docs-command-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository getsentry/XcodeBuildMCP (6,506 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 420 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.