Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GetSkill-Agent/getskill-skills --skill receiving-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GetSkill-Agent/getskill-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/getskill-agent/getskill-skills/receiving-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getskill-agent/getskill-skills/receiving-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getskill-agent/getskill-skills/receiving-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/getskill-agent/getskill-skills/receiving-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/getskill-agent/getskill-skills/receiving-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.01543 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00772 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00309 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
receiving-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 226 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 6a0016f8f141
receiving-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository GetSkill-Agent/getskill-skills (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,543 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
structured-code-review
Performs a structured five-stage code review covering requirements compliance, correctness, code quality, testing, and security/performance. Each stage uses targeted checklists and categorized feedback (Blocker/Major/Minor/Nit) with actionable suggestions and rationale. Use when the user asks for code review, PR…
Code Review Excellence
Master code review best practices with constructive feedback patterns, quality assurance standards, review checklists, security considerations, and collaborative improvement techniques for high-quality software delivery.
code-review-quality
Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.
code-review-expert
Expert-level code review focusing on quality, security, performance, and maintainability. Use this skill for conducting thorough code reviews, identifying issues, and providing constructive feedback.
code-review-playbook
Use this skill when conducting or improving code reviews. Provides structured review processes, conventional comments patterns, language-specific checklists, and feedback templates. Ensures consistent, constructive, and thorough code reviews across teams.
code-review-standards
Severity-tagged code review rubric (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) used by the code-critic agent to produce APPROVE/WARN/BLOCK verdicts with evidence-backed findings.