Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GGbond-bo/MemOmics-Agent --skill extract_pdf_contentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GGbond-bo/MemOmics-AgentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/extract_pdf_content)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/extract_pdf_content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/extract_pdf_content/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/extract_pdf_content"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ggbond-bo/memomics-agent/extract_pdf_content.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00847 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00424 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
extract_pdf_content scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Extract Pdf Content
Extract text content from a PDF file.
When to Use
When you need extract pdf content analysis
Parameters
| Parameter | Default | Notes |
|---|---|---|
url |
[Required] URL of the PDF file (str) |
Parameter Adaptation: Adjust parameters based on tissue quality, species, and condition. Literature values take priority, then official defaults, then tissue-specific adjustments.
Proven Scripts
Scripts that have been successfully executed and passed analysis review. These are automatically saved after successful runs.
| Species | Tissue | Condition | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (none yet) |
Common Issues
| Error | Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| (accumulated from runs) |
References
- Source: Biomni
- Category: literature
- Language: Python
🗣️ 辩论机制（debate_analysis）
本 skill 在执行后，如果涉及参数选择、方法决策、结果判断等不确定环节，必须调用 工具进行多角色辩论。
辩论规则
- 正方 3 位专业编辑（各自独立，互相看不到）：生物学编辑 / 统计学编辑 / 生信编辑
- 反方 4 位专业编辑（各自独立，互相看不到，也看不到正方）：生物学编辑 / 统计学编辑 / 生信编辑 / 历史经验编辑
- 裁判：看到所有 7 方论点后给出裁决 + 置信度（高/中/低）
- 上下文隔离：每个编辑是独立的 LLM API 调用，messages 只包含自己的 prompt
- 分科知识库：生物学编辑用 biology_kb / 统计学编辑用 statistics_kb / 生信编辑用 bioinfo_kb / 历史经验编辑用 history_errors
- 辩论结果自动归档到 results/.../log/debate_*.json
触发场景
- 参数选择有多个合理选项时（如分辨率 0.4 vs 0.6 vs 0.8）
- 结果可能受方法选择影响时（如不同注释方法给出不同结果）
- 生物结论需要验证可靠性时
- QC 阈值不确定时（如 MT% 阈值 10% vs 15% vs 20%）
不触发场景
- 参数有明确知识库推荐且无争议时
- 纯计算步骤（如保存文件、读取数据）
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 88 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 40953ca3e3d7
extract_pdf_content is a skill published in the GitHub repository GGbond-bo/MemOmics-Agent (19 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 847 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pydicom
Use pydicom to read, inspect, write, transform, and safely preflight local DICOM datasets and pixel data. Applies to DICOM metadata, transfer syntaxes, compression plugins, frames, private elements, JSON, and bounded de-identification review.
foundry-hosted-agent-validation
Step-by-step process for validating a Python Foundry hosted agent sample (under python/samples/04-hosting/foundry-hosted-agents/) end to end — running it locally (native runtime and azd ai agent run) and after deploying it to an Azure AI Foundry project with azd. Use this when asked to validate a hosted agent sample.
skill-doc-delivery
Convert markdown to DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, PDF office documents — use when you need exportable deliverables.
pdf-extract-create-workflow
Complete PDF lifecycle: download, extract, and generate structured documents with reportlab.
document-direct-python
Use direct Python execution for reliable document creation including spreadsheets, PDFs, and structured reports.
parse-document
Convert a PDF, scan, image of a page, or office file to clean markdown through the connected Superlinked MCP edge, so the source document is not read into model context directly. Use when the user asks to read, parse, OCR, extract from, summarize, or answer questions about a document.