Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Ghosteken/agent-harness --skill azure-ai-contentsafety-pygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Ghosteken/agent-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ghosteken/agent-harness/azure-ai-contentsafety-py)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ghosteken/agent-harness/azure-ai-contentsafety-py"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ghosteken/agent-harness/azure-ai-contentsafety-py/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ghosteken/agent-harness/azure-ai-contentsafety-py"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ghosteken/agent-harness/azure-ai-contentsafety-py.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01345 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00673 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00269 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
azure-ai-contentsafety-py scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to azure-ai-contentsafety-py — 11 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 223 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Azure AI Content Safety SDK for Python
Detect harmful user-generated and AI-generated content in applications.
Installation
pip install azure-ai-contentsafety
Environment Variables
CONTENT_SAFETY_ENDPOINT=https://<resource>.cognitiveservices.azure.com
CONTENT_SAFETY_KEY=<your-api-key>
Authentication
API Key
from azure.ai.contentsafety import ContentSafetyClient
from azure.core.credentials import AzureKeyCredential
import os
client = ContentSafetyClient(
endpoint=os.environ["CONTENT_SAFETY_ENDPOINT"],
credential=AzureKeyCredential(os.environ["CONTENT_SAFETY_KEY"])
)
Entra ID
from azure.ai.contentsafety import ContentSafetyClient
from azure.identity import DefaultAzureCredential
client = ContentSafetyClient(
endpoint=os.environ["CONTENT_SAFETY_ENDPOINT"],
credential=DefaultAzureCredential()
)
Analyze Text
from azure.ai.contentsafety import ContentSafetyClient
from azure.ai.contentsafety.models import AnalyzeTextOptions, TextCategory
from azure.core.credentials import AzureKeyCredential
client = ContentSafetyClient(endpoint, AzureKeyCredential(key))
request = AnalyzeTextOptions(text="Your text content to analyze")
response = client.analyze_text(request)
# Check each category
for category in [TextCategory.HATE, TextCategory.SELF_HARM,
TextCategory.SEXUAL, TextCategory.VIOLENCE]:
result = next((r for r in response.categories_analysis
if r.category == category), None)
if result:
print(f"{category}: severity {result.severity}")
Analyze Image
from azure.ai.contentsafety import ContentSafetyClient
from azure.ai.contentsafety.models import AnalyzeImageOptions, ImageData
from azure.core.credentials import AzureKeyCredential
import base64
client = ContentSafetyClient(endpoint, AzureKeyCredential(key))
# From file
with open("image.jpg", "rb") as f:
image_data = base64.b64encode(f.read()).decode("utf-8")
request = AnalyzeImageOptions(
image=ImageData(content=image_data)
)
response = client.analyze_image(request)
for result in response.categories_analysis:
print(f"{result.category}: severity {result.severity}")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 223 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 1319f983bfd0
azure-ai-contentsafety-py is a skill published in the GitHub repository Ghosteken/agent-harness (2 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,345 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to azure-ai-contentsafety-py, differing in 11 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
python-conventions
Python style and structure conventions based on PEP 8. Load before implementing or reviewing any pyproject.toml/requirements.txt-based feature.
statistical-analysis
Structured pipeline for statistical analysis deliverables — SPSS, R, Python. Covers reliability, chi-square, correlation, regression, assumption checking, and client-ready reporting.
makefile-generation
Generates Makefiles with testing, linting, formatting, and automation targets. Use when starting a project or standardizing build automation.
python-patterns
A guide to common Python coding patterns, style rules, type hints, and practices for writing code that is readable, robust, efficient, and easier to maintain.
python-testing
A Python testing guide covering pytest, test coverage, and test-driven development (TDD), a method of writing a failing test before the code that makes it pass.
plankton-code-quality
Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.