Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to gianverdum/ai-dev-skillset. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gianverdum/ai-dev-skillset/main/.agents/skills/quality-revisao-aderencia/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gianverdum/ai-dev-skillsetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gianverdum/ai-dev-skillset/quality-revisao-aderencia)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gianverdum/ai-dev-skillset/quality-revisao-aderencia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gianverdum/ai-dev-skillset/quality-revisao-aderencia/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gianverdum/ai-dev-skillset/quality-revisao-aderencia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gianverdum/ai-dev-skillset/quality-revisao-aderencia.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00249 | $0.07706 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00125 | $0.03853 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00050 | $0.01541 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00771 |
Grade A, and why
quality-revisao-aderencia scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 290 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Revisao de Aderencia a Skills e Rules
Use esta skill como ultima etapa antes de declarar uma tarefa concluida e, em mudancas grandes, tambem ao terminar cada etapa significativa (modulo novo, camada nova, refator estrutural). O objetivo e fechar o ciclo TDD/quality e impedir desvios silenciosos.
Quando rodar
Regra absoluta de gatilho — antes de qualquer frase de conclusao:
Antes de escrever no resumo final QUALQUER uma destas frases (ou equivalente em outro idioma), VOCE PRECISA ter rodado a checklist objetiva desta skill:
- "concluido" / "completo" / "completa" / "pronto" / "feito" / "terminei" / "finalizado" / "encerrado"
- "the refactoring is complete" / "refactor is done" / "implementation complete" / "all done"
- "refatoracao concluida" / "feature pronta" / "task pronta" / "tudo certo"
- Qualquer declaracao categorica de fim de tarefa (mesmo implicita: "rodei tudo, passou", "all checks pass", etc.)
Se a checklist objetiva (secao "Pontos a verificar") tem 2 ou mais itens vermelhos, voce esta PROIBIDO de usar qualquer dessas frases. Use o formato WIP transparente em vez (secao "Formato no reporte final QUANDO refatoracao esta em WIP").
Declarar conclusao com itens vermelhos sem WIP = DESVIO grave de honestidade, anula o credito do trabalho feito.
Outros gatilhos:
- Ao terminar uma implementacao, fix ou refator, antes do resumo final ao usuario.
- Ao concluir um modulo novo, antes de seguir para o proximo.
- Ao concluir uma camada (domain/application/interface) novamente, antes de seguir.
- Sempre que uma extensao criar modulo novo: aplique a checklist completa SEPARADAMENTE ao modulo novo (suite e2e propria, README proprio, cobertura propria, literal unions, etc.), mesmo que o modulo existente ja tenha cobertura completa.
- Quando o usuario pedir explicitamente revisao de aderencia.
Sintoma da skill nao rodada (auto-deteccao):
Se voce esta prestes a escrever uma frase de conclusao e NAO consegue listar mentalmente o status (❌/✅) dos 9 itens da checklist objetiva nem dos anti-padroes desta secao, voce nao rodou a skill. Pare, leia esta skill, rode item-a-item, depois decida entre "concluido" ou "WIP transparente".
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 290 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 9706eba3c5b9
quality-revisao-aderencia is a skill published in the GitHub repository gianverdum/ai-dev-skillset (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 249 tokens to every session and 7,706 once invoked, about $0.0012 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…