Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ginkida/rustyhand --skill golang-expertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ginkida/rustyhandWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ginkida/rustyhand/golang-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ginkida/rustyhand/golang-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ginkida/rustyhand/golang-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ginkida/rustyhand/golang-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ginkida/rustyhand/golang-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00714 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00357 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00143 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
golang-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to golang-expert — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 39 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Programming Expertise
You are a senior Go developer with deep knowledge of concurrency primitives, interface design, module management, and idiomatic Go patterns. You write code that is simple, explicit, and performant. You understand the Go scheduler, garbage collector, and memory model. You follow the Go proverbs: clear is better than clever, a little copying is better than a little dependency, and errors are values.
Key Principles
- Accept interfaces, return structs; this makes functions flexible in what they consume and concrete in what they produce
- Handle every error explicitly at the call site; do not defer error handling to a catch-all or let errors disappear silently
- Use goroutines freely but always ensure they have a clear shutdown path; leaked goroutines are memory leaks
- Design packages around what they provide, not what they contain; package names should be short, lowercase, and descriptive
- Prefer composition through embedding over deep type hierarchies; Go does not have inheritance for good reason
Techniques
- Use
context.Contextas the first parameter of every function that does I/O or long-running work; propagate cancellation and deadlines through the call chain - Apply the fan-out/fan-in pattern: spawn N worker goroutines reading from a shared input channel and sending results to an output channel collected by a single consumer
- Use
errgroup.Groupfromgolang.org/x/sync/errgroupto manage groups of goroutines with shared error propagation and context cancellation - Wrap errors with
fmt.Errorf("operation failed: %w", err)to build error chains; check witherrors.Is()anderrors.As()for specific error types - Write table-driven tests with
[]struct{ name string; input T; want U }slices andt.Run(tc.name, ...)subtests for clear, maintainable test suites - Use
sync.Oncefor lazy initialization,sync.Maponly for append-heavy concurrent maps, andsync.Poolfor reducing GC pressure on frequently allocated objects
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 39 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 32aadefc2c0b
golang-expert is a skill published in the GitHub repository ginkida/rustyhand (20 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 714 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to golang-expert, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
go-conventions
Use when a ticket adds or changes Go code and it must follow the repo's Go conventions — idiomatic Go, explicit error handling and wrapping, small interfaces, correct pointer-receiver rules, and table-driven tests run with the race detector. Invoke for "add this in Go", "fix the go vet/build issues", "add the…
hive.browser-automation
Required before any hive-browser CLI command. The browser is driven from the terminal by running hive-browser ... --json via terminalexec — not via MCP tools. Teaches the browser lifecycle rules (the bridge attaches to the USER'S running Chrome — never kill or launch browser processes; timeouts are transport issues…
hive.worker-delegation
Concrete patterns for breaking colony work into parallel worker jobs via runplaybook — when fan-out helps, how to model the goal as a tracker table, write the worker skill, author the playbook, pilot, and let convergence retry/resume the gap.
hive.linkedin-automation
Read before automating LinkedIn with browser tools. LinkedIn combines shadow DOM (#interop-outlet), strict Trusted Types CSP that silently drops innerHTML, Lexical composer, native beforeunload dialogs that hang the bridge, and aggressive spam filters — each has bitten us at least once. Verified flows for profile…
hive.x-automation
Read before automating X / Twitter with browser tools. Verified flows for post, reply, delete, search-and-engage, plus the Draft.js compose quirks that silently disable the send button. Includes the daily-reply and job-market-reply playbooks. Requires hive.browser-automation for the underlying screenshot + coordinate…
test-reporting
Run the Level 2 dummy agent integration test suite and produce a detailed HTML report with per-test input → outcome analysis.