earnings-analysis

earnings-analysis is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ginlix-ai/LangAlpha. It costs 23 tokens per session (2,091 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of earnings-analysis, Apache-2.0.

A report format for analyzing a company’s quarterly earnings after the results are released. It compares actual performance with expectations and updates the investment view.

In plain words
What is it for?
Explaining beats or misses, revising estimates, assessing effects on the investment case, and presenting the findings with summary tables and charts.
Why use it?
It focuses the analysis on what changed in the quarter instead of repeating background information about a company already being followed.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Explaining beats or misses, revising estimates, assessing effects on the investment case, and presenting the findings with summary tables and charts.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ginlix-ai/langalpha/earnings-analysis
About the project

LangAlpha is an agent workspace for researching financial markets and supporting investment decisions through persistent research, news analysis, and parallel subagents. It is for investors who want to develop and update trading theses over time, including generating long-short pair-trade ideas. The catalogue entries provide the skills, instructions, MCP servers, and plugin that make up its agent workflow.

ginlix-ai/LangAlpha · 1,727 stars · on GitHub · langalpha.ai

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ginlix-ai/LangAlpha --skill earnings-analysis
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ginlix-ai/LangAlpha

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for earnings-analysis

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ginlix-ai/langalpha/earnings-analysis/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ginlix-ai/langalpha/earnings-analysis)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ginlix-ai/langalpha/earnings-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ginlix-ai/langalpha/earnings-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for earnings-analysis

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ginlix-ai/langalpha/earnings-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ginlix-ai/langalpha/earnings-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 23 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,091 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 94% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00023 $0.02091
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.01045
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00418
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00209

Measured 9d ago against content hash c0514b9564be, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-08, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

earnings-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

94% identical to earnings-analysis — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/langalpha_research/skills/earnings-analysis/SKILL.md · 230 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 230 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Equity Research Earnings Update

Create professional EARNINGS UPDATE REPORTS analyzing quarterly results for companies already under coverage, following institutional standards (JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley format).

Key Characteristics:

  • Length: 8-12 pages
  • Word Count: 3,000-5,000 words
  • Tables: 1-3 summary tables (NOT comprehensive)
  • Figures: 8-12 charts
  • Turnaround: 1-2 days (within 24-48 hours of earnings)
  • Audience: Clients already familiar with the company
  • Focus: What's NEW - beat/miss, updated estimates, thesis impact
  • Font: Times New Roman throughout (unless user specifies otherwise)

When to Use

Use when the user requests:

  • "Create an earnings update for [Company] Q3 2024"
  • "Analyze [Company]'s quarterly results"
  • "Post-earnings report for [Company]"
  • "Q1/Q2/Q3/Q4 update for [Company]"

Do NOT use if:

  • User requests "initiation report" → Use different skill
  • User requests "flash note" or "quick take" → Different format
  • Company is not already covered → Need initiation first

Critical Requirements

1. Speed & Timeliness

  • Publish within 24-48 hours of earnings release
  • Focus on NEW information only
  • Don't rehash company background extensively

2. Beat/Miss Analysis

  • Lead with whether company beat or missed estimates
  • Quantify variances (e.g., "Revenue beat by $120M or 3%")
  • Explain WHY results differed from expectations

3. Summary Format

  • Keep tables to 1-3 (summary only, not comprehensive)
  • No full P&L/Cash Flow/Balance Sheet (just key metrics)
  • Assume reader has seen initiation report

4. Citations & Source Attribution ⭐⭐⭐ MANDATORY

CRITICAL: Properly cite all data with SPECIFIC sources and CLICKABLE HYPERLINKS.

Include specific citations WITH CLICKABLE LINKS in every figure and table:

Source: Q3 2024 10-Q filed November 8, 2024; Company earnings release
        [Hyperlink "10-Q" to: https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/viewer?accession=...]
        [Hyperlink "earnings release" to: https://investor.company.com/news/q3-2024]

Read the full file on GitHub · 230 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 230 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A c0514b9564be

Subscribe to this mod's changes

earnings-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository ginlix-ai/LangAlpha (1,727 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 2,091 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to earnings-analysis, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.