codex-result-handling

codex-result-handling is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from gitguffaw/codex-router. It costs 18 tokens per session (371 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of codex-result-handling, Apache-2.0.

A set of rules for showing helper results to users, including findings, evidence, edits, and next steps.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for presenting code reviews, helper output, file changes, failures, and follow-up questions in the required order and format.
Why use it?
It keeps review results accurate and prevents important distinctions, such as uncertainty or failed work, from being lost or misrepresented.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Part of the codex-router plugin — 4 skills, 11 commands, 1 agent, 3 hooks shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gitguffaw/codex-router/codex-result-handling
Any agent
npx skills add gitguffaw/codex-router --skill codex-result-handling
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gitguffaw/codex-router

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Or install codex-router, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills, 11 commands, 1 agent, 3 hooks.

Per session 18 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 371 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 94% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00018 $0.00371
Opus 5 $0.00009 $0.00186
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00074
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00037

Measured 3d ago against content hash b81fe0e49013, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codex-result-handling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

94% identical to codex-result-handling — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/codex-router/skills/codex-result-handling/SKILL.md · 22 lines

What it actually says

Codex Result Handling

When the helper returns Codex output:

  • Preserve the helper's verdict, summary, findings, and next steps structure.
  • For review output, present findings first and keep them ordered by severity.
  • Use the file paths and line numbers exactly as the helper reports them.
  • Preserve evidence boundaries. If Codex marked something as an inference, uncertainty, or follow-up question, keep that distinction.
  • Preserve output sections when the prompt asked for them, such as observed facts, inferences, open questions, touched files, or next steps.
  • If there are no findings, say that explicitly and keep the residual-risk note brief.
  • If Codex made edits, say so explicitly and list the touched files when the helper provides them.
  • For codex-router:codex-rescue, do not turn a failed or incomplete Codex run into a Claude-side implementation attempt. Report the failure and stop.
  • For codex-router:codex-rescue, if Codex was never successfully invoked, do not generate a substitute answer at all.
  • CRITICAL: After presenting review findings, STOP. Do not make any code changes. Do not fix any issues. You MUST explicitly ask the user which issues, if any, they want fixed before touching a single file. Auto-applying fixes from a review is strictly forbidden, even if the fix is obvious.
  • If the helper reports malformed output or a failed Codex run, include the most actionable stderr lines and stop there instead of guessing.
  • If the helper reports that setup or authentication is required, direct the user to /codex-router:setup and do not improvise alternate auth flows.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 22 lines · 18 tokens per session scan A b81fe0e49013

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codex-result-handling is a skill published in the GitHub repository gitguffaw/codex-router (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 18 tokens to every session and 371 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to codex-result-handling, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

codex-delegate

Delegate a coding task to the OpenAI Codex CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Codex — phrasings like "have Codex do X", "delegate this to Codex", "run it through Codex", or "use Codex to implement/fix/refactor" …

amElnagdy/delegate-skills · 155 tokens

commandcode-delegate

Delegate a coding task to the Command Code CLI (cmd) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Command Code — phrasings like "have Command Code do X", "delegate this to commandcode", "run it through cmd", or "use Command Code…

amElnagdy/delegate-skills · 123 tokens

opencode-delegate

Delegate a coding task to the OpenCode CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to OpenCode — phrasings like "have OpenCode do X", "delegate this to OpenCode", "run it through OpenCode", or "use OpenCode to…

amElnagdy/delegate-skills · 136 tokens

warp-delegate

Delegate a coding task to the Warp Agent CLI (oz) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Warp - phrasings like "have Warp implement X", "delegate this to the Warp CLI", "run it through Warp", "use oz to…

amElnagdy/delegate-skills · 144 tokens

agy-delegate

Delegate a coding task to the Google Antigravity CLI (agy) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Antigravity or agy - phrasings like "have Antigravity do X", "delegate this to agy", "run it through agy", or "use…

amElnagdy/delegate-skills · 132 tokens

claude-delegate

Delegate a coding task to a separate Claude Code CLI process or another Claude session as an implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use only when the user explicitly asks to delegate implementation to Claude Code, another Claude session, or the claude CLI — for example, "have another Claude implement…

amElnagdy/delegate-skills · 117 tokens