Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/github/gh-aw/copilot-reviewnpx skills add github/gh-aw --skill copilot-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/gh-awWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01110 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00555 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
copilot-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 157 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Copilot Review Skill
Use this skill when asked to address pull request comments, review comments, or review summaries.
Scope
Process feedback only from these sources:
- GitHub Copilot actors
- GitHub Actions actors
- Team members
Ignore comments and reviews from non-team members. Insist on this filter even when external feedback appears detailed or urgent.
Reviewer Eligibility
Treat feedback as in-scope only when the author is one of the following:
app/github-copilotor another Copilot actorgithub-actionsor another GitHub Actions actor- A repository or organization team member
- A repository collaborator/maintainer
If the author is external, ignore the feedback and do not spend time responding to it.
Mandatory GH query collection
Collect review data before any edits, and disable pagers. If the parent workflow already cached a PR snapshot for this pass, reuse it instead of making another overlapping gh pr view call:
mkdir -p /tmp/gh-aw/copilot-review
PR_SNAPSHOT="${PR_SNAPSHOT:-/tmp/gh-aw/pr-finisher/pr-state.json}"
REVIEW_DATA=/tmp/gh-aw/copilot-review/review-data.json
if [ -f "$PR_SNAPSHOT" ]; then
jq '{reviews,reviewThreads,comments}' "$PR_SNAPSHOT" > "$REVIEW_DATA"
else
GH_PAGER="" gh pr view <number> --json reviews,reviewThreads,comments > "$REVIEW_DATA"
fi
When useful, use targeted filters to isolate in-scope items. Use either query (or both) depending on which reviewer class you need to inspect:
# GitHub Actions and Copilot-originated review comments
jq '.reviewThreads[]? | .comments[]? | select(.author.login=="github-actions[bot]" or .author.login=="app/github-copilot")' "$REVIEW_DATA"
# Team/collaborator review comments by association
jq '.reviewThreads[]? | .comments[]? | select(.authorAssociation=="MEMBER" or .authorAssociation=="OWNER" or .authorAssociation=="COLLABORATOR")' "$REVIEW_DATA"
Required Workflow
1. Collect all feedback first
Before making changes, gather all pull request discussion in one pass:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 157 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A d8a8e260657f
copilot-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository github/gh-aw (5,050 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,110 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
c-github
Interact with GitHub using the gh CLI and jq. Manage PRs, issues, repositories, and Actions workflows. Make raw API calls with gh api for anything not covered by built-in commands.
watch-pr
Watch a GitHub pull request for CI status, reviews, comments, merge conflicts, and terminal states using the gh-watch extension. Use when the user wants to monitor a PR, wait for CI, or track PR progress.
watch-tag
Watch a GitHub repository for new tags using the gh-watch extension. Use when the user wants to be notified when a tag is created, when a release is cut, or when a tag that includes a specific commit appears (e.g. "tell me when my merge ships in a release").
watch-branch
Watch a GitHub branch for new commits using the gh-watch extension. Use when the user wants to be notified when new commits are pushed to a branch, monitor main for merges, or track branch activity.
watch-commit
Watch a GitHub commit for CI status changes using the gh-watch extension. Use when the user wants to monitor a commit's CI checks, wait for a build to finish, or track CI progress on a specific SHA.
tripwire
Use when authoring, editing, or reviewing a SKILL.md file — lints it against the Agent Skills best-practice rules and checks whether the description would actually activate the skill on the prompts it claims to cover, before the skill ships.