code-review

code-review is a skill for Claude Code from github/spec-kit. It costs 48 tokens per session (160 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review checklist for changes in a Spec Kit repository. It checks that tests cover intended behaviour and prevented failures, and that bug fixes include evidence the bug was reproduced and fixed.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing a diff or pull request to assess positive and negative test coverage, bug-fix regression tests, and consistent wording.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance that a change lacks regression protection or uses terms that do not match the rest of the repository.

Skill for Claude Code ✓ vendor

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter.

Good fit Use it when reviewing a diff or pull request to assess positive and negative test coverage, bug-fix regression tests, and consistent wording.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/github/spec-kit/code-review
About the project

Spec Kit is an open-source toolkit for defining software requirements and plans before implementation with an AI coding agent. It is used by developers and organizations following a spec-driven development process.

github/spec-kit · 134,495 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add github/spec-kit --skill code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/github/spec-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/github/spec-kit/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/github/spec-kit/code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/github/spec-kit/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/github/spec-kit/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/github/spec-kit/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/github/spec-kit/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 48 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 160 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00048 $0.00160
Opus 5 $0.00024 $0.00080
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00032
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00016

Measured today against content hash 29e05574a2c0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.github/skills/code-review/SKILL.md · 12 lines

What it actually says

Code Review

  1. Ensure each code change has test cases that verify what the code should do and what it should prevent.
  2. Ensure bug-fix pull requests include a regression test that demonstrates the bug was reproducible before the change and is fixed afterward; if the reviewer cannot run the comparison, use available evidence and state that limitation.
  3. Ensure wording changes use repository-consistent terms; exclude community-authored catalog content and its generated documentation from this check.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 12 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 29e05574a2c0

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository github/spec-kit (134,495 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 160 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.