Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to githubnext/gh-aw-workshop. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/main/.github/skills/curriculum-quantitative-assessment/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw-workshopWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/curriculum-quantitative-assessment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/curriculum-quantitative-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/curriculum-quantitative-assessment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/curriculum-quantitative-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/githubnext/gh-aw-workshop/curriculum-quantitative-assessment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00207 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00083 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
curriculum-quantitative-assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 36 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A eb27f9eccedc
curriculum-quantitative-assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository githubnext/gh-aw-workshop (56 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 207 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
extract-wisdom
Extract wisdom, insights, and actionable takeaways from YouTube videos, blog posts, articles, or text files. Use when asked to extract wisdom or key insights from a given content source.
ml-llm-wiki
Use when answering questions from this machine-learning knowledge base. Triggers: questions about transformers, attention cost and efficiency, and long-context scaling; 'what do we know about attention', 'check the ML wiki'. Read-only querying of compiled knowledge; to add, update, supersede, lint, audit, or critique…
explain
Explain a concept, system or piece of code as a diagram-first terminal answer, or as an interactive HTML page.
resolve-pr-feedback
Use when asked to resolve, address, fix, or reply to review feedback on a GitHub Pull Request or GitLab Merge Request, including review comments, unresolved threads, requested changes, or "apply the review comments" requests.
prepare-ticket
Use when asked whether a ticket or issue is ready for development, or to prepare, validate, refine, challenge, or sanity-check a Jira work item, GitHub Issue, or GitLab Issue before building it. Checks material claims against evidence, follows questions until outcome decisions are settled, rewrites the title and…
review-pr
Use when asked to review a GitHub Pull Request or GitLab Merge Request, including PR/MR URLs, identifiers, discussions, findings, inline comments, approvals, or request-changes actions.