Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gitstq/awesome-ai-agent-skills --skill super-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gitstq/awesome-ai-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gitstq/awesome-ai-agent-skills/super-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gitstq/awesome-ai-agent-skills/super-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gitstq/awesome-ai-agent-skills/super-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gitstq/awesome-ai-agent-skills/super-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gitstq/awesome-ai-agent-skills/super-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00143 | $0.02284 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00072 | $0.01142 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00457 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
super-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 255 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Super Reviewer - AI Senior Code Review Engine
The most comprehensive AI code review skill. One skill replaces 10+ specialized review tools.
Why This Skill?
Most code review skills only check one dimension (style or security). Super Reviewer performs a 7-dimensional holistic review that mimics how a senior staff engineer reviews code in production:
- Correctness - Logic bugs, null/undefined handling, edge cases, race conditions
- Security - OWASP Top 10, injection attacks, auth bypasses, data exposure
- Performance - N+1 queries, unnecessary re-renders, memory leaks, algorithm complexity
- Code Style - Naming conventions, consistency, readability, DRY principle
- Architecture - SOLID principles, coupling/cohesion, design patterns
- Testing - Test coverage gaps, missing edge case tests, test quality
- Accessibility - WCAG 2.1 AA compliance, keyboard navigation, screen reader support
Quick Start
No setup needed. Simply say any of:
- "Review this code/PR"
- "Check this file for issues"
- "Do a security audit on..."
- "Review this code for performance"
The skill auto-detects language and framework.
Review Process
Phase 1: Context Analysis
- Read all changed files in the PR/diff
- Detect programming languages and frameworks used
- Identify affected modules, APIs, and data flows
- Check for existing tests related to changes
Phase 2: Multi-Dimensional Scan
For each changed file, run ALL of the following checks:
2.1 Correctness Check
- Null/undefined dereferences and missing null checks
- Off-by-one errors in loops and array indexing
- Unhandled promise rejections and async/await errors
- Incorrect boolean comparisons (== vs ===, assignment in conditions)
- Missing return statements in conditional branches
- Floating point precision issues
- String encoding problems
- Date/time zone handling errors
- Integer overflow in mathematical operations
2.2 Security Check (OWASP-aligned)
- Injection: SQL injection, NoSQL injection, command injection, XSS, template injection
- Auth: Hardcoded credentials, missing auth checks, insecure token handling
- Data: Sensitive data in logs, PII exposure, insecure data storage
- Crypto: Weak hash algorithms, missing salt, predictable random values
- Network: Missing rate limiting, CORS misconfiguration, open redirects
- Dependencies: Known vulnerable packages, outdated dependencies
- File ops: Path traversal, insecure file uploads, directory listing
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 255 lines · 143 tokens per session scan A 90bfd2db5292
super-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository gitstq/awesome-ai-agent-skills (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 143 tokens to every session and 2,284 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…