nestjs-code-review

nestjs-code-review is a skill for Claude Code from giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit. It costs 82 tokens per session (1,885 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured review guide for NestJS applications, a TypeScript framework for server-side programs and APIs. It checks controllers, services, modules, dependency injection, guards, interceptors, pipes, data access, and module boundaries, then groups findings by severity.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review NestJS controllers and services, check module organization and dependencies, validate request handling and access guards, and inspect database integration.
Why use it?
It helps catch design and implementation problems before code is merged or after a feature is built. It makes review findings easier to act on by explaining their severity and suggested fixes.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter.

Part of the developer-kit-typescript plugin — 25 skills, 3 commands, 13 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to review NestJS controllers and services, check module organization and dependencies, validate request handling and access guards, and inspect database integration.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/nestjs-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit --skill nestjs-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install developer-kit-typescript, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 25 skills, 3 commands, 13 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for nestjs-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/nestjs-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/nestjs-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/nestjs-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/nestjs-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for nestjs-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/nestjs-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit/nestjs-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 82 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,885 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Socket pass 1 Apr 2026
  • Snyk fail 1 Apr 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00082 $0.01885
Opus 5 $0.00041 $0.00942
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00377
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00188

Measured today against content hash 22a56f3d8d12, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

nestjs-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/developer-kit-typescript/skills/nestjs-code-review/SKILL.md · 228 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 228 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

NestJS Code Review

Overview

Provides structured code review for NestJS applications. Findings categorized by severity (Critical, Warning, Suggestion) with actionable recommendations. Delegates to nestjs-code-review-expert agent for deep analysis.

When to Use

  • "review NestJS code", "NestJS code review", "check my NestJS controller/service"
  • Before merging pull requests or after implementing new features
  • Validating NestJS decorators, DI patterns, guard implementations
  • Architecture validation for NestJS modules and providers
  • Reviewing DTOs, pipes, interceptors, and database integration (TypeORM, Prisma, Drizzle)

Instructions

  1. Identify Scope: Determine which NestJS files and modules are under review. Use glob and grep to discover controllers, services, modules, guards, interceptors, and pipes in the target area.

  2. Analyze Module Structure: Verify proper module organization — each feature should have its own module with clearly defined imports, controllers, providers, and exports. Check for circular dependencies and proper module boundaries.

  3. Review Dependency Injection: Validate that all injectable services use constructor injection. Check provider scoping (singleton, request, transient) matches the intended lifecycle. Ensure no direct instantiation bypasses the DI container.

  4. Evaluate Controllers: Review HTTP method usage, route naming, status codes, request/response DTOs, validation pipes, and OpenAPI decorators. Confirm controllers are thin — business logic belongs in services.

  5. Assess Services & Business Logic: Check that services encapsulate business logic properly. Verify error handling, transaction management, and proper separation from infrastructure concerns. Look for service methods that are too large or have too many responsibilities.

  6. Check Security: Review guard implementations, authentication/authorization patterns, input validation with class-validator, and protection against common vulnerabilities (injection, XSS, CSRF).

Read the full file on GitHub · 228 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 228 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A 22a56f3d8d12

Subscribe to this mod's changes

nestjs-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit (343 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,885 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-10.