Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Glad-Labs/poindexter --skill researchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Glad-Labs/poindexterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/glad-labs/poindexter/research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/glad-labs/poindexter/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/glad-labs/poindexter/research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/glad-labs/poindexter/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/glad-labs/poindexter/research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.00801 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00400 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Research skill
Three prompts the pipeline uses to convert raw signal into topic decisions.
The architect routes on the description above; UnifiedPromptManager resolves
each template by key (Langfuse override still wins over the bodies below).
Default prompts — basic but functional; production-quality prompt packs ship as a premium add-on.
research.analyze_search_results
Analyze these search results and return JSON with keys: summary, key_points (list), sources (list).
Search results: {search_results}
topic.ranking
You are scoring topic candidates for a content pipeline against the operator's weighted goals.
Goals (weight in pct):
{weights_descr}
Candidates:
{cand_block}
Return STRICT JSON keyed by candidate id, mapping each id directly to its score
as a number from 0 to 100:
{{"<id>": <score 0-100>, ...}}
Return ONLY the JSON, no commentary.
Why score-only (Glad-Labs/poindexter#926). This prompt used to also ask for a nested
breakdownobject keyed by"<GOAL_TYPE>". Asking the model to invent those key names was the single biggest failure surface: Langfuse traces show 10 of 19 real calls over 14 days failing to parse, and the short failures die inside a degenerate repetition loop on a breakdown key —"BRAND own own own own …","EDU//////////////…". Even calls that did parse carried invented keys ("BREAKDOWN","BRAND own","BREAKING_NEWS"). Every failure fell back to the raw embedding pre-rank for the whole batch.The breakdown was never worth generating:
topic_ranking.weighted_cosine_scorealready computes a real per-goal breakdown from the goal vectors (plus a_groundingobservability key), stores it on the candidate — and the LLM's hallucinated version then overwrote it. Asking only for the score removes the failure surface and keeps the better, calculated data (feedback_machine_rules: prefer calculated over generated).
research.distill_topic_angle
Read the snippets from an AI-operated content business's internal records.
You are looking for a STORY worth telling the audience below — something that changed or broke, a decision that was made, or a lesson that was learned. Routine operational status (clean cycles, monitoring chatter, internal tooling housekeeping) is not a story.
Audience / niche: {niche_context}
Snippets:
{joined}
If the snippets contain a story, return STRICT JSON: {{"topic": "<short title>", "angle": "<one-sentence framing: why this matters / what we learned>"}}.
If they do not, return STRICT JSON: {{"storyworthy": false, "reason": "<one short phrase>"}}.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 87 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A b53c160e73c5
research is a skill published in the GitHub repository Glad-Labs/poindexter (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 801 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
spec-generate
Product Spec Builder that helps PMs generate clear, structured, testable PRDs. Creates both full and lightweight specs for any product or platform with a guided step-by-step workflow. Output in English Markdown format.
product-team
A Chinese-language product development workflow led by one AI team lead taking several roles: product strategy, requirements writing, prototype creation, and user-experience review.
Playwright (Automation + MCP + Scraper)
Browser automation via Playwright MCP. Navigate websites, click elements, fill forms, take screenshots, extract data, and debug real browser workflows. Use when (1) you need a real browser, not static fetch; (2) the task involves Playwright MCP, browser tools, Playwright tests, scripts, or JS-rendered pages; (3) the…
ux-walkthrough-skill
A user-experience review process that examines a product’s screens and user journeys against its product requirements document (PRD). It checks consistency, accessibility, errors, and whether users can complete tasks clearly.
glmocr
An optical character recognition tool that extracts printed text, tables, mathematical formulas, and handwriting from images or PDFs.
guide
A project-guide workflow that summarizes the OpenClaw Bot system, its commands, enabled skills, memory, and recent social publishing activity.