Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Global-mindee/WAY --skill llm-integrationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Global-mindee/WAYWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/global-mindee/way/llm-integration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/global-mindee/way/llm-integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/global-mindee/way/llm-integration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/global-mindee/way/llm-integration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/global-mindee/way/llm-integration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.01490 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00745 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00298 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00149 |
Grade A, and why
llm-integration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 226 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LLM Integration
API Client Pattern
import Anthropic from "@anthropic-ai/sdk";
const client = new Anthropic();
async function generateResponse(
systemPrompt: string,
userMessage: string,
options?: { maxTokens?: number; temperature?: number }
): Promise<string> {
const response = await client.messages.create({
model: "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
max_tokens: options?.maxTokens ?? 1024,
temperature: options?.temperature ?? 0,
system: systemPrompt,
messages: [{ role: "user", content: userMessage }],
});
const textBlock = response.content.find(block => block.type === "text");
return textBlock?.text ?? "";
}
Streaming Responses
async function streamResponse(
messages: Array<{ role: "user" | "assistant"; content: string }>,
onChunk: (text: string) => void
): Promise<string> {
const stream = client.messages.stream({
model: "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
max_tokens: 4096,
messages,
});
let fullText = "";
for await (const event of stream) {
if (event.type === "content_block_delta" && event.delta.type === "text_delta") {
onChunk(event.delta.text);
fullText += event.delta.text;
}
}
return fullText;
}
const response = await streamResponse(
[{ role: "user", content: "Explain async/await in TypeScript" }],
(chunk) => process.stdout.write(chunk)
);
Function Calling (Tool Use)
const tools: Anthropic.Tool[] = [
{
name: "search_database",
description: "Search the product database by name, category, or price range",
input_schema: {
type: "object" as const,
properties: {
query: { type: "string", description: "Search query" },
category: { type: "string", description: "Product category filter" },
max_price: { type: "number", description: "Maximum price" },
},
required: ["query"],
},
},
];
async function agentLoop(userMessage: string): Promise<string> {
const messages: Anthropic.MessageParam[] = [
{ role: "user", content: userMessage },
];
while (true) {
const response = await client.messages.create({
model: "claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
max_tokens: 4096,
tools,
messages,
});
if (response.stop_reason === "end_turn") {
const text = response.content.find(b => b.type === "text");
return text?.text ?? "";
}
const toolUse = response.content.find(b => b.type === "tool_use");
if (!toolUse || toolUse.type !== "tool_use") break;
const result = await executeToolCall(toolUse.name, toolUse.input);
messages.push({ role: "assistant", content: response.content });
messages.push({
role: "user",
content: [{ type: "tool_result", tool_use_id: toolUse.id, content: result }],
});
}
return "";
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 226 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 81cd817deb05
llm-integration is a skill published in the GitHub repository Global-mindee/WAY (11 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,490 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-engineering-toolkit
6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
llm-app-patterns
Production-ready patterns for building LLM applications. Covers RAG pipelines, agent architectures, prompt IDEs, and LLMOps monitoring. Use when designing AI applications, implementing RAG, building agents, or setting up LLM observability.
Prompting
Meta-prompting standard library for generating, optimizing, and composing prompts programmatically via Standards, Handlebars Templates, and Tools; output is always a prompt to use elsewhere, not final content. USE WHEN meta-prompting, template generation, prompt optimization, prompt engineering, write a prompt, create…
Fabric
Execute any of 240+ specialized prompt patterns natively across Extraction, Summarization, Analysis, Creation, Improvement, Security, Rating. Common: extractwisdom, createthreatmodel, analyzeclaims, improvewriting, reviewcode, mermaid, youtubesummary. CLI used only for YouTube transcript (-y) and URL fallback (-u).…
ai-product
Every product will be AI-powered. The question is whether you'll build it right or ship a demo that falls apart in production.
llm-application-dev
Building applications with Large Language Models - prompt engineering, RAG patterns, and LLM integration. Use for AI-powered features, chatbots, or LLM-based automation.