Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gmickel/flow-next --skill flow-next-syncgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gmickel/flow-nextWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gmickel/flow-next/flow-next-sync)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gmickel/flow-next/flow-next-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gmickel/flow-next/flow-next-sync/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gmickel/flow-next/flow-next-sync"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gmickel/flow-next/flow-next-sync.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02534 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01014 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00507 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00253 |
Grade A, and why
flow-next-sync scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 221 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Manual Plan-Sync
Manually trigger plan-sync to update downstream task specs.
Read working-rules.md first unless you already have this run; it holds for every step of this skill.
Preamble
CRITICAL: flowctl is BUNDLED - NOT installed globally. Define once; subsequent blocks use $FLOWCTL:
FLOWCTL="${CODEX_HOME:-$HOME/.codex}/scripts/flowctl"
[ -x "$FLOWCTL" ] || FLOWCTL="<plugin-root>/scripts/flowctl" # <plugin-root> = the directory two levels above this skill's SKILL.md file (the harness gave you that file's absolute path when the skill loaded); substitute it literally
[ -x "$FLOWCTL" ] || FLOWCTL=".flow/bin/flowctl"
Input
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Format: <id> [--dry-run]
<id>- task IDfn-N-slug.M(or legacyfn-N.M,fn-N-xxx.M) or spec IDfn-N-slug(or legacyfn-N,fn-N-xxx), or a resolvable tracker handle (wor-17/wor-17.M) thatflowctl showmaps to the linked spec/task--dry-run- show changes without writing
Workflow
Step 1: Parse Arguments
REPO_ROOT="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd)"
Parse $ARGUMENTS for:
- First positional arg =
ID --dry-runflag =DRY_RUN(true/false)
Validate ID first (handle-recognition rule):
- The id is resolved by
flowctl show, not by a prefix check. A session that rejects a resolvable tracker handle as an unknown id — because it gated on "must start withfn-" — has broken this. Route the arg through$FLOWCTL show <ID> --json(Step 3); flowctl's widened resolver maps a tracker key (wor-17/wor-17.M) to its linked spec/task, so a resolvable handle is the existing spec/task, never a new id./flow-next:sync wor-17therefore resolves the linked spec. - If no ID provided: "Usage: /flow-next:sync [--dry-run]"
- If the arg does not resolve via
flowctl show(Step 3): "Unknown ID. Use fn-N-slug (spec) / fn-N-slug.M (task), a tracker handle (wor-17), or legacy fn-N, fn-N-xxx."
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 16d ago Changed bdbd16c908e3
- 18d ago Changed · +2 lines bcb734524c16
- 23d ago Changed · +6 lines 39468500786a
- 1mo ago Changed 5c5b95e6597a
- 1mo ago First seen · 213 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 113ed5ad1e98
flow-next-sync is a skill published in the GitHub repository gmickel/flow-next (711 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,534 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Comprehensive PR/issue review - analyzes architecture, tests, identifies unrelated changes mixed in, drafts review comment or issue comment. Use when user asks to review a PR, check a PR, look at PR changes, or comment on an issue.
backlog
Read, work, and maintain a Git repo's deferred-work items in docs/backlog/, one file per item. Use when the user says "backlog", "check backlog", "what's on my backlog", "work the backlog", "address the backlog", "add to backlog", "clean up backlog", or when a review or task produced items that are real but not being…
clarify
This skill should be used when user appears confused, frustrated, or shows misalignment between expectations and reality. Triggers on phrases like "I don't understand", "this doesn't make sense", "confused", "wait, shouldn't it...", "why is this happening", "I thought X did Y", contradictory statements, or frustration…
writing-style
Use for technical communication - GitHub/GitLab tickets, PR/MR descriptions, issue comments, code review comments, commit messages. Direct, brief style with no AI-speak. NOT for README.md, public docs, or blog posts.
root-cause-investigator
Systematic root cause analysis for errors, bugs, and unexpected behaviors using 5-Why methodology. Use when user reports errors, build failures, test failures, performance issues, integration problems, or any "it's not working" scenarios.
last-tag
Show commits since the last tag in a formatted table. Use when user asks "what changed since last release", "commits since last tag", "last-tag", "what's new", or wants to see recent unreleased changes.