Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GML-MMGroup/ClipTalk --skill cliptalk-social-reframe-exportergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GML-MMGroup/ClipTalkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gml-mmgroup/cliptalk/cliptalk-social-reframe-exporter)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gml-mmgroup/cliptalk/cliptalk-social-reframe-exporter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gml-mmgroup/cliptalk/cliptalk-social-reframe-exporter/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gml-mmgroup/cliptalk/cliptalk-social-reframe-exporter"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gml-mmgroup/cliptalk/cliptalk-social-reframe-exporter.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.00353 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00177 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00071 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00035 |
Grade A, and why
cliptalk-social-reframe-exporter scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 19 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A c9ff6d950e1e
cliptalk-social-reframe-exporter is a skill published in the GitHub repository GML-MMGroup/ClipTalk (109 stars, last pushed today), with no licence file. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 353 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-12.
Other skills, from other repositories
sage-review
Deep, platform-neutral code review for PRs and CRs in ONE thorough single pass — design reasoning (Problem Worth Solving & Solution Fit) as one dimension alongside the 9 code-level dimensions, with chain-of-consequences, self-critique, and draft-only comments. The single app-owned source of truth.
learn-from-sage
Detection-gap (miss) analysis for Code Review Sage. Learn from shipped fixes, acted-on human comments, and design outcomes to close reviewer blind spots. Inline during review stages a candidate; a human triggers a one-shot AI consolidation into the live ruleset.
review-fix-signoff-loop
Use when writing Agent Relay or Ricky workflows that must loop review, fix, and validation with fresh agent context until independent signoff agents, typically Claude and Codex, both agree the work is comprehensively complete. Covers fresh-context iterations, repairable gates, dual reviewer verdict contracts…
prepare-pr
LOAD THIS WHENEVER A TASK WILL OPEN OR UPDATE A PR — including a PR you raise incidentally while doing something else — and run the full loop without waiting to be asked. End-to-end drives working-tree changes to a review-ready pull request — commit, sync base, squash to one commit, open/update the PR — then KEEPS…
github-code-review
Review PRs: diffs, inline comments via gh or REST.
simplify-code
Sequential 3-lens cleanup of recent code changes.