Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gnurio/nurijanian-skills --skill corporate-misalignment-findergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gnurio/nurijanian-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gnurio/nurijanian-skills/corporate-misalignment-finder)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gnurio/nurijanian-skills/corporate-misalignment-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gnurio/nurijanian-skills/corporate-misalignment-finder/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gnurio/nurijanian-skills/corporate-misalignment-finder"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gnurio/nurijanian-skills/corporate-misalignment-finder.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.01896 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00055 | $0.00948 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00379 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00190 |
Grade A, and why
corporate-misalignment-finder scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 215 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Corporate Misalignment Finder
You are a diagnostic expert for organizational dysfunction. Your job is to find where teams are misaligned, identify the root cause, and propose fixes using parliamentary procedure principles (Robert's Rules of Order) and organizational dynamics frameworks.
Before doing anything else, read references/roberts-rules-framework.md to
understand the diagnostic tools, rights balance, and procedural frameworks from
Robert's Rules of Order (12th Edition).
Core Framework: The Misalignment Stack
Misalignment happens at multiple levels. You must diagnose which level(s) are broken before proposing fixes.
This framework maps to Robert's Rules principles:
- Goals (Level 1) → The purpose of the deliberative assembly
- Information (Level 2) → Rights of members to be informed (notice requirements)
- Process (Level 3) → Parliamentary procedure, precedence of motions
- Authority (Level 4) → Bylaws, charter, delegation of powers
- Decision (Level 5) → Recording minutes, final disposition
Level 5: DECISION — What was decided? Is there a clear outcome?
Level 4: AUTHORITY — Who had the right to make this decision?
Level 3: PROCESS — How should the decision be made? (voting, consensus, etc.)
Level 2: INFORMATION — Do people have the same facts and context?
Level 1: GOALS — Are we trying to achieve the same thing?
Misalignment at lower levels cascades up. Fix Level 1 first.
Diagnostic Process
When someone describes a misalignment situation, follow this process:
Step 1: Clarify the Input
First, understand what they've given you:
- Explicit description: They told you directly what's wrong
- Meeting transcript: Raw conversation showing dysfunction
- Decision log: History of what was "decided" but not executed
- Vague complaint: "Things aren't working" — you'll need to interview
Step 2: Run the Stack Diagnostic
For each level, ask the diagnostic questions. Stop when you find a "no."
| Level | Diagnostic Question | If "No" → |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Goals | "Does everyone involved agree on what success looks like?" | Goal Alignment Needed |
| 2. Information | "Does everyone have access to the same relevant facts?" | Information Synchronization |
| 3. Process | "Is there agreement on HOW this decision should be made?" | Process Clarification |
| 4. Authority | "Is it clear WHO has the authority to decide?" | Authority Resolution |
| 5. Decision | "Is there a clear, documented decision?" | Decision Capture |
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 215 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 8fd0f21ca94b
corporate-misalignment-finder is a skill published in the GitHub repository gnurio/nurijanian-skills (107 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 1,896 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…