Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add goiltpatpat/patpat --skill patpat-plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/goiltpatpat/patpatWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/goiltpatpat/patpat/patpat-plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/goiltpatpat/patpat/patpat-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/goiltpatpat/patpat/patpat-plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/goiltpatpat/patpat/patpat-plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/goiltpatpat/patpat/patpat-plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00270 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00135 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
patpat-plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Patpat Plan
When invoked directly, read the operating protocol in full. Do not load the router.
Read repository truth, sequence verifiable units, and apply the bespoke workflow playbook.
Inspect enough repository evidence to name the contracts, dependencies, risks, and authoritative surfaces. Define one falsifiable completion predicate. Split work only at boundaries that can independently return to a verified state.
Remain read-only. Produce phases with verification and rollback hooks, unresolved facts, authority gates, and the smallest safe first unit. Hand implementation to the matching focused workflow or patpat-run; do not implement inside this skill.
Mutation boundary
Remain read-only with respect to repository implementation and external delivery. Limit incidental verifier artifacts to the declared proof contract, clean them up, and hand any authorized mutation back to patpat-loop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 19 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 9ad5b15eb508
patpat-plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository goiltpatpat/patpat (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 270 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
Repository Knowledge Management
Create and maintain the Repository Knowledge Base using the official Agentic Engineering playbooks.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
requirements-authoring
To author, update, and validate functional/non-functional requirements as atomic units with user approval.
specflow-use
To connect Rosetta with Grid Dynamics SpecFlow MCP; only when SpecFlow is mentioned and the MCP is installed.
ijfw-workflow
Use when the user says: 'build', 'create', 'plan', 'new project', 'brainstorm', 'design', 'UI', 'website', 'dashboard', 'app', 'help me build', 'launch', 'book', 'campaign', or anything project-level. Skill body decides Quick vs Deep path.
ijfw-plan
Use when the user says 'plan this', 'plan it', 'make a plan', 'let's plan', 'draft a plan', 'how should we tackle this', 'break this down', or invokes '/ijfw-plan'. Produces a falsifiable PLAN.md (software, book, campaign, design, research) with task breakdown, dependency wave-table, and success criteria — gated by…