Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gongyijie85/dsh-ecc --skill agent-architecture-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gongyijie85/dsh-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/agent-architecture-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/agent-architecture-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/agent-architecture-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/agent-architecture-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/agent-architecture-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00095 | $0.02329 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.01164 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00466 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00233 |
Grade A, and why
agent-architecture-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to agent-architecture-audit — 31 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 258 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Architecture Audit
A diagnostic workflow for agent systems that hide failures behind wrapper layers, stale memory, retry loops, or transport/rendering mutations.
When to Activate
MANDATORY for:
- Releasing any agent or LLM-powered application to production
- Shipping features with tool calling, memory, or multi-step workflows
- Agent behavior degrades after adding wrapper layers
- User reports "the agent is getting worse" or "tools are flaky"
- Same model works in playground but breaks inside your wrapper
- Debugging agent behavior for more than 15 minutes without finding root cause
Especially critical when:
- You've added new prompt layers, tool definitions, or memory systems
- Different agents in your system behave inconsistently
- The model was fine yesterday but is hallucinating today
- You suspect hidden repair/retry loops silently mutating responses
Do not use for:
- General code debugging — use
agent-introspection-debugging - Code review — use language-specific reviewer agents
- Security scanning — use
security-revieworsecurity-review/scan - Agent performance benchmarking — use
agent-eval - Writing new features — use the appropriate workflow skill
The 12-Layer Stack
Every agent system has these layers. Any of them can corrupt the answer:
| # | Layer | What Goes Wrong |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | System prompt | Conflicting instructions, instruction bloat |
| 2 | Session history | Stale context injection from previous turns |
| 3 | Long-term memory | Pollution across sessions, old topics in new conversations |
| 4 | Distillation | Compressed artifacts re-entering as pseudo-facts |
| 5 | Active recall | Redundant re-summary layers wasting context |
| 6 | Tool selection | Wrong tool routing, model skips required tools |
| 7 | Tool execution | Hallucinated execution — claims to call but doesn't |
| 8 | Tool interpretation | Misread or ignored tool output |
| 9 | Answer shaping | Format corruption in final response |
| 10 | Platform rendering | Transport-layer mutation (UI, API, CLI mutates valid answers) |
| 11 | Hidden repair loops | Silent fallback/retry agents running second LLM pass |
| 12 | Persistence | Expired state or cached artifacts reused as live evidence |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 258 lines · 95 tokens per session scan A 64f57e232c35
agent-architecture-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository gongyijie85/dsh-ecc (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 95 tokens to every session and 2,329 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to agent-architecture-audit, differing in 31 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
manage-taskboard
Manage work in the native DeepSeek Harness Taskboard with exact task ids and optimistic versions. Use when an Agent must inspect project work, claim an eligible todo, record progress or blockers, verify an implementation, submit it for human review, or release its own claim; also use when a human asks how to accept…
diagnosing-bugs-zh
A diagnostic workflow for difficult bugs and performance regressions, meaning cases where software behaves incorrectly or becomes slower after a change.
dsh-hooks-authoring
Instructions for writing and debugging dsh-hooks-plugin scripts, which run during tool or session events such as before a tool call or after it finishes. These scripts return JSON decisions such as allowing, asking about, or denying an action.
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
diagnosing-bugs
Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.
dsh-web-pet-developer
Create a pet for the dsh-pet plugin and integrate it into the dsh web GUI — author a v2 pet.json manifest plus an 8-column x 9-row atlas per the Codex/hatch-pet contract (live2d pets, voice packs and status decorations included), drop it into the pet-center user directory or contribute it as a built-in asset under…