Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gongyijie85/dsh-ecc --skill django-verificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gongyijie85/dsh-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/django-verification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/django-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/django-verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/django-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/django-verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.02806 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01403 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00561 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00281 |
Grade A, and why
django-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to django-verification — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 471 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Django Verification Loop
Run before PRs, after major changes, and pre-deploy to ensure Django application quality and security.
When to Activate
- Before opening a pull request for a Django project
- After major model changes, migration updates, or dependency upgrades
- Pre-deployment verification for staging or production
- Running full environment → lint → test → security → deploy readiness pipeline
- Validating migration safety and test coverage
Phase 1: Environment Check
# Verify Python version
python --version # Should match project requirements
# Check virtual environment
which python
pip list --outdated
# Verify environment variables
python -c "import os; import environ; print('DJANGO_SECRET_KEY set' if os.environ.get('DJANGO_SECRET_KEY') else 'MISSING: DJANGO_SECRET_KEY')"
If environment is misconfigured, stop and fix.
Phase 2: Code Quality & Formatting
# Type checking
mypy . --config-file pyproject.toml
# Linting with ruff
ruff check . --fix
# Formatting with black
black . --check
black . # Auto-fix
# Import sorting
isort . --check-only
isort . # Auto-fix
# Django-specific checks
python manage.py check --deploy
Common issues:
- Missing type hints on public functions
- PEP 8 formatting violations
- Unsorted imports
- Debug settings left in production configuration
Phase 3: Migrations
# Check for unapplied migrations
python manage.py showmigrations
# Create missing migrations
python manage.py makemigrations --check
# Dry-run migration application
python manage.py migrate --plan
# Apply migrations (test environment)
python manage.py migrate
# Check for migration conflicts
python manage.py makemigrations --merge # Only if conflicts exist
Report:
- Number of pending migrations
- Any migration conflicts
- Model changes without migrations
Phase 4: Tests + Coverage
# Run all tests with pytest
pytest --cov=apps --cov-report=html --cov-report=term-missing --reuse-db
# Run specific app tests
pytest apps/users/tests/
# Run with markers
pytest -m "not slow" # Skip slow tests
pytest -m integration # Only integration tests
# Coverage report
open htmlcov/index.html
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 471 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A cb1b6c5938c8
django-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository gongyijie85/dsh-ecc (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 2,806 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to django-verification, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
manage-taskboard
Manage work in the native DeepSeek Harness Taskboard with exact task ids and optimistic versions. Use when an Agent must inspect project work, claim an eligible todo, record progress or blockers, verify an implementation, submit it for human review, or release its own claim; also use when a human asks how to accept…
delivery-proof
Delivery proof and the doublecheck report. Use when the work is done and the delivery must be proven — consolidate the spec, test timeline, review verdicts, and verification checks into a doublecheckreport, and only then claim completion.
red-green-tdd
Red/green test discipline for implementation work. Use once a doublecheck spec is on record and implementation is about to start — write a test that fails for the missing behavior, run it to see it fail (red), make the change, run again to see it pass (green).
code2skill-review-flow
A read-only reviewer for the main user flows in a package generated by Code2Skill. It checks whether representative paths are basically usable, without proving that every source-code detail is included.
codebase-design
A design vocabulary and workflow for creating code modules with small interfaces that hide substantial behavior. A seam is a place where behavior can be changed or tested without editing the surrounding code.
dev-qa
A development and quality process for building software, testing it, and checking it for security problems. It separates implementation, quality assurance, and security review while coordinating their handoffs.