flutter-dart-code-review

flutter-dart-code-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from gongyijie85/dsh-ecc. It costs 72 tokens per session (5,257 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of flutter-dart-code-review, MIT.

A checklist for reviewing Flutter applications and Dart code, covering widgets, application state, performance, security, accessibility, and project structure.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Flutter and Dart projects, including widget code, state management, dependencies, generated files, and platform-specific code.
Why use it?
It helps reviewers spot common design, language, and maintenance problems across different Flutter libraries.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review Flutter and Dart projects, including widget code, state management, dependencies, generated files, and platform-specific code.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/flutter-dart-code-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add gongyijie85/dsh-ecc --skill flutter-dart-code-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for flutter-dart-code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/flutter-dart-code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/flutter-dart-code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/flutter-dart-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/flutter-dart-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for flutter-dart-code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/flutter-dart-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/flutter-dart-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 72 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,257 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 97% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00072 $0.05257
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.02629
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.01051
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00526

Measured 5d ago against content hash 5ceac13c9b99, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

flutter-dart-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

97% identical to flutter-dart-code-review — 28 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

skills/flutter-dart-code-review/SKILL.md · 437 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 437 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Flutter/Dart Code Review Best Practices

Comprehensive, library-agnostic checklist for reviewing Flutter/Dart applications. These principles apply regardless of which state management solution, routing library, or DI framework is used.


1. General Project Health

  • Project follows consistent folder structure (feature-first or layer-first)
  • Proper separation of concerns: UI, business logic, data layers
  • No business logic in widgets; widgets are purely presentational
  • pubspec.yaml is clean — no unused dependencies, versions pinned appropriately
  • analysis_options.yaml includes a strict lint set with strict analyzer settings enabled
  • No print() statements in production code — use dart:developer log() or a logging package
  • Generated files (.g.dart, .freezed.dart, .gr.dart) are up-to-date or in .gitignore
  • Platform-specific code isolated behind abstractions

2. Dart Language Pitfalls

  • Implicit dynamic: Missing type annotations leading to dynamic — enable strict-casts, strict-inference, strict-raw-types
  • Null safety misuse: Excessive ! (bang operator) instead of proper null checks or Dart 3 pattern matching (if (value case var v?))
  • Type promotion failures: Using this.field where local variable promotion would work
  • Catching too broadly: catch (e) without on clause; always specify exception types
  • Catching Error: Error subtypes indicate bugs and should not be caught
  • Unused async: Functions marked async that never await — unnecessary overhead
  • late overuse: late used where nullable or constructor initialization would be safer; defers errors to runtime
  • String concatenation in loops: Use StringBuffer instead of + for iterative string building
  • Mutable state in const contexts: Fields in const constructor classes should not be mutable
  • Ignoring Future return values: Use await or explicitly call unawaited() to signal intent
  • var where final works: Prefer final for locals and const for compile-time constants
  • Relative imports: Use package: imports for consistency
  • Mutable collections exposed: Public APIs should return unmodifiable views, not raw List/Map
  • Missing Dart 3 pattern matching: Prefer switch expressions and if-case over verbose is checks and manual casting
  • Throwaway classes for multiple returns: Use Dart 3 records (String, int) instead of single-use DTOs
  • print() in production code: Use dart:developer log() or the project's logging package; print() has no log levels and cannot be filtered

Read the full file on GitHub · 437 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 437 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 5ceac13c9b99

Subscribe to this mod's changes

flutter-dart-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository gongyijie85/dsh-ecc (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 5,257 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to flutter-dart-code-review, differing in 28 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

manage-taskboard

Manage work in the native DeepSeek Harness Taskboard with exact task ids and optimistic versions. Use when an Agent must inspect project work, claim an eligible todo, record progress or blockers, verify an implementation, submit it for human review, or release its own claim; also use when a human asks how to accept…

shengsheng90/DSH-taskboard · 88 tokens

delivery-review

Adversarial self-review before delivery. Use once the implementation reaches green and before you declare the work done — assume the delivery fails its own spec, hunt for the strongest supportable objections, answer them, and re-review after fixes.

PerryLink/dsh-doublecheck · 50 tokens

code2skill-review-source

A read-only review skill for checking whether a Code2Skill-generated result matches the source code it was authorized to use. It examines request handling, tool handoffs, transformations, authentication, and attachments.

leechen298/Code2Skill · 52 tokens

code-review

A review of changes made after a specified commit, branch, tag, or merge point. It checks both the project's coding standards and whether the changes implement the original issue or specification.

gongyijie85/mattpocock-skills-dsh-zh · 107 tokens

improve-codebase-architecture

A codebase review that looks for places where a small module hides too little of its complexity and where the code is hard to understand or test. It produces an HTML report and then examines one selected improvement in depth.

gongyijie85/mattpocock-skills-dsh-zh · 50 tokens

code-review

A structured code-review workflow for examining one fixed code change. It checks correctness, security, tests, and maintainability in that order.

Dominic789654/awesome-deepseek-harness · 77 tokens