Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gongyijie85/dsh-ecc --skill kotlin-coroutines-flowsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gongyijie85/dsh-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/kotlin-coroutines-flows)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/kotlin-coroutines-flows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/kotlin-coroutines-flows/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/kotlin-coroutines-flows"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/kotlin-coroutines-flows.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.01782 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00891 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00356 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00178 |
Grade A, and why
kotlin-coroutines-flows scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to kotlin-coroutines-flows — 5 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 286 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Kotlin Coroutines & Flows
Patterns for structured concurrency, Flow-based reactive streams, and coroutine testing in Android and Kotlin Multiplatform projects.
When to Activate
- Writing async code with Kotlin coroutines
- Using Flow, StateFlow, or SharedFlow for reactive data
- Handling concurrent operations (parallel loading, debounce, retry)
- Testing coroutines and Flows
- Managing coroutine scopes and cancellation
Structured Concurrency
Scope Hierarchy
Application
└── viewModelScope (ViewModel)
└── coroutineScope { } (structured child)
├── async { } (concurrent task)
└── async { } (concurrent task)
Always use structured concurrency — never GlobalScope:
// BAD
GlobalScope.launch { fetchData() }
// GOOD — scoped to ViewModel lifecycle
viewModelScope.launch { fetchData() }
// GOOD — scoped to composable lifecycle
LaunchedEffect(key) { fetchData() }
Parallel Decomposition
Use coroutineScope + async for parallel work:
suspend fun loadDashboard(): Dashboard = coroutineScope {
val items = async { itemRepository.getRecent() }
val stats = async { statsRepository.getToday() }
val profile = async { userRepository.getCurrent() }
Dashboard(
items = items.await(),
stats = stats.await(),
profile = profile.await()
)
}
SupervisorScope
Use supervisorScope when child failures should not cancel siblings:
suspend fun syncAll() = supervisorScope {
launch { syncItems() } // failure here won't cancel syncStats
launch { syncStats() }
launch { syncSettings() }
}
Flow Patterns
Cold Flow — One-Shot to Stream Conversion
fun observeItems(): Flow<List<Item>> = flow {
// Re-emits whenever the database changes
itemDao.observeAll()
.map { entities -> entities.map { it.toDomain() } }
.collect { emit(it) }
}
StateFlow for UI State
class DashboardViewModel(
observeProgress: ObserveUserProgressUseCase
) : ViewModel() {
val progress: StateFlow<UserProgress> = observeProgress()
.stateIn(
scope = viewModelScope,
started = SharingStarted.WhileSubscribed(5_000),
initialValue = UserProgress.EMPTY
)
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 286 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A ed7d895ecd6c
kotlin-coroutines-flows is a skill published in the GitHub repository gongyijie85/dsh-ecc (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 1,782 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to kotlin-coroutines-flows, differing in 5 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
manage-taskboard
Manage work in the native DeepSeek Harness Taskboard with exact task ids and optimistic versions. Use when an Agent must inspect project work, claim an eligible todo, record progress or blockers, verify an implementation, submit it for human review, or release its own claim; also use when a human asks how to accept…
delivery-proof
Delivery proof and the doublecheck report. Use when the work is done and the delivery must be proven — consolidate the spec, test timeline, review verdicts, and verification checks into a doublecheckreport, and only then claim completion.
red-green-tdd
Red/green test discipline for implementation work. Use once a doublecheck spec is on record and implementation is about to start — write a test that fails for the missing behavior, run it to see it fail (red), make the change, run again to see it pass (green).
codebase-design-zh
A set of design principles for creating modules with small interfaces and substantial behaviour behind them. It explains terms such as interface, implementation, adapter, and seam in plain terms for this design approach.
code2skill-review-flow
A read-only reviewer for the main user flows in a package generated by Code2Skill. It checks whether representative paths are basically usable, without proving that every source-code detail is included.
dev-qa
A development and quality process for building software, testing it, and checking it for security problems. It separates implementation, quality assurance, and security review while coordinating their handoffs.