Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gongyijie85/dsh-ecc --skill orch-build-mvpgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gongyijie85/dsh-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/orch-build-mvp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/orch-build-mvp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/orch-build-mvp/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/orch-build-mvp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/orch-build-mvp.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.00656 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00041 | $0.00328 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
orch-build-mvp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to orch-build-mvp — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
orch-build-mvp
Actor · action · target: orch · build · mvp. Thin wrapper over the shared
engine in orch-pipeline.
When to Use
- The user has a design / spec document (SDD, PRD, system_design) and wants a working vertical slice bootstrapped from it.
- Takes a doc path as its argument, e.g.
civicpulse/docs/SDD-v0.6.md.
Operation settings
- Default size floor: large — this is the full pipeline including Scaffold.
- Phase mask: 0 (read the spec) → 1 → 2 (heavy) → 3 (scaffold) → 4 → 5 → 6.
- First move (phase 0 → 2): read the doc; extract scope, locked decisions, and the feature list; order it into thin vertical slices (one end-to-end path first, not all-models-then-all-views). Phase 3 stands up that first slice.
How It Works
- Run the
orch-pipelineengine with the settings above. - Reuse the existing GAN harness instead of hand-rolling an iterate loop:
- Translate the SDD into
gan-harness/spec.md+gan-harness/eval-rubric.md(this stands in for whatgan-plannerwould generate — you already have the spec). - Drive the build with
/gan-build "<one-line brief>" --skip-planner(defaults:--max-iterations 15,--pass-threshold 7.0,--eval-mode playwright; use--eval-mode code-onlyfor non-UI slices). - That command runs the
gan-generator→gan-evaluatorloop and writesgan-harness/feedback/feedback-NNN.mduntil the score passes or plateaus.
- Translate the SDD into
- Stop at Gate 1 (slice plan) and Gate 2 (pre-commit). Commit the
scaffold and each slice as separate
feat:commits. - Add
security-reviewerfor any slice touching a security trigger.
Example
orch-build-mvp: civicpulse/docs/SDD-v0.6.md
→ read SDD → slice list (vertical) → scaffold slice 1 [GATE 1: approve]
→ /gan-build --skip-planner (generator → evaluator loop) scores vs spec → review
→ commit feat: [GATE 2: confirm] → next slice
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 50 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A b54a9e181961
orch-build-mvp is a skill published in the GitHub repository gongyijie85/dsh-ecc (7 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 656 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to orch-build-mvp, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
red-green-tdd
Red/green test discipline for implementation work. Use once a doublecheck spec is on record and implementation is about to start — write a test that fails for the missing behavior, run it to see it fail (red), make the change, run again to see it pass (green).
tdd-zh
A test-first development guide for building features or fixing bugs. Test-driven development, or TDD, means writing a test that fails, making it pass with the smallest change, and then improving the code.
implement-zh
An implementation workflow for completing work described in a specification or tickets. It encourages test-first development where appropriate, runs checks during the work, and ends with review and a commit.
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.
tdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
manage-taskboard
Manage work in the native DeepSeek Harness Taskboard with exact task ids and optimistic versions. Use when an Agent must inspect project work, claim an eligible todo, record progress or blockers, verify an implementation, submit it for human review, or release its own claim; also use when a human asks how to accept…