Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gongyijie85/dsh-ecc --skill perl-testinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gongyijie85/dsh-eccWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/perl-testing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/perl-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/perl-testing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/perl-testing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gongyijie85/dsh-ecc/perl-testing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.03107 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01554 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00621 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00311 |
Grade A, and why
perl-testing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
91% identical to perl-testing — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 477 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Perl Testing Patterns
Comprehensive testing strategies for Perl applications using Test2::V0, Test::More, prove, and TDD methodology.
When to Activate
- Writing new Perl code (follow TDD: red, green, refactor)
- Designing test suites for Perl modules or applications
- Reviewing Perl test coverage
- Setting up Perl testing infrastructure
- Migrating tests from Test::More to Test2::V0
- Debugging failing Perl tests
TDD Workflow
Always follow the RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle.
# Step 1: RED — Write a failing test
# t/unit/calculator.t
use v5.36;
use Test2::V0;
use lib 'lib';
use Calculator;
subtest 'addition' => sub {
my $calc = Calculator->new;
is($calc->add(2, 3), 5, 'adds two numbers');
is($calc->add(-1, 1), 0, 'handles negatives');
};
done_testing;
# Step 2: GREEN — Write minimal implementation
# lib/Calculator.pm
package Calculator;
use v5.36;
use Moo;
sub add($self, $a, $b) {
return $a + $b;
}
1;
# Step 3: REFACTOR — Improve while tests stay green
# Run: prove -lv t/unit/calculator.t
Test::More Fundamentals
The standard Perl testing module — widely used, ships with core.
Basic Assertions
use v5.36;
use Test::More;
# Plan upfront or use done_testing
# plan tests => 5; # Fixed plan (optional)
# Equality
is($result, 42, 'returns correct value');
isnt($result, 0, 'not zero');
# Boolean
ok($user->is_active, 'user is active');
ok(!$user->is_banned, 'user is not banned');
# Deep comparison
is_deeply(
$got,
{ name => 'Alice', roles => ['admin'] },
'returns expected structure'
);
# Pattern matching
like($error, qr/not found/i, 'error mentions not found');
unlike($output, qr/password/, 'output hides password');
# Type check
isa_ok($obj, 'MyApp::User');
can_ok($obj, 'save', 'delete');
done_testing;
SKIP and TODO
use v5.36;
use Test::More;
# Skip tests conditionally
SKIP: {
skip 'No database configured', 2 unless $ENV{TEST_DB};
my $db = connect_db();
ok($db->ping, 'database is reachable');
is($db->version, '15', 'correct PostgreSQL version');
}
# Mark expected failures
TODO: {
local $TODO = 'Caching not yet implemented';
is($cache->get('key'), 'value', 'cache returns value');
}
done_testing;
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 477 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 17723ed2249f
perl-testing is a skill published in the GitHub repository gongyijie85/dsh-ecc (6 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 3,107 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to perl-testing, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
red-green-tdd
Red/green test discipline for implementation work. Use once a doublecheck spec is on record and implementation is about to start — write a test that fails for the missing behavior, run it to see it fail (red), make the change, run again to see it pass (green).
tdd
A test-driven development workflow, where you write a test for one behavior, make it pass, and then improve the code while keeping the test.
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.
tdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
manage-taskboard
Manage work in the native DeepSeek Harness Taskboard with exact task ids and optimistic versions. Use when an Agent must inspect project work, claim an eligible todo, record progress or blockers, verify an implementation, submit it for human review, or release its own claim; also use when a human asks how to accept…
test-first
A test-first development guide, where tests are written before the code they check. TDD, or test-driven development, means first writing a test that fails, then writing the simplest code that makes it pass.