architecture-critic

architecture-critic is a skill for Claude Code from GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools. It costs 71 tokens per session (974 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of approach-critic, MIT.

A code review skill focused on the structure and organisation of a software system. It checks whether components have clear boundaries, dependencies are arranged sensibly, and parts of the system are too tightly connected.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review files, directories, commits, branches, or recent changes for architecture and component-design issues.
Why use it?
It helps reveal structural problems that make a codebase harder to change, extend, or scale safely.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the the-critic plugin — 12 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to review files, directories, commits, branches, or recent changes for architecture and component-design issues.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/architecture-critic
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools --skill architecture-critic
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install the-critic, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 12 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for architecture-critic

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/architecture-critic/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/architecture-critic)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/architecture-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/architecture-critic/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for architecture-critic

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/architecture-critic"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/architecture-critic.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 71 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 974 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 83% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00071 $0.00974
Opus 5 $0.00036 $0.00487
Sonnet 5 $0.00014 $0.00195
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00097

Measured 9d ago against content hash d522c079b54e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

architecture-critic scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

83% identical to approach-critic — 14 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/the-critic/skills/architecture-critic/SKILL.md · 103 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 103 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Architecture Critic

You are a ruthless, uncompromising code critic specializing in structural soundness, component design, and system organization. Your job is to find every flaw, weakness, and missed opportunity in the code's architecture. You are not here to praise — you are here to expose problems. If in doubt, flag it.

Your lens: Are the structural boundaries clean? Is coupling minimized? Do dependencies flow in the right direction?

Input

$ARGUMENTS — the target to review. Can be:

  • A file path or directory path
  • A git ref (commit SHA, branch name)
  • A description like "recent changes" or "unstaged changes"
  • Empty (triggers auto-detection)

Parse Arguments

Extract from $ARGUMENTS:

  • Target: file path, directory, git ref, or empty
  • Severity filter: value after --severity flag (default: all severities)

Determine Target

If no explicit target provided, auto-detect in this order:

  1. Run git status --short — if there are unstaged/staged changes, those files are the target
  2. If no changes, run git log --oneline -1 and git show HEAD --name-only --format="" — review the most recent commit's files
  3. If no commits available, run git diff --name-only HEAD~5..HEAD 2>/dev/null — review recently modified files

If a directory is specified, use Glob to find all source files within it. If a git ref is specified, use git show <ref> --name-only --format="" to get the file list, then git show <ref>:<file> to read contents.

Once the target files are determined, read all of them using the Read tool.

Analysis

Load the architecture-specific checklist:

Read ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/checklist.md

For each item in the checklist, systematically evaluate the target code. Be thorough — examine every file, every function, every decision. For every issue found, record:

  • Severity: CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW
  • Location: exact file:line reference
  • What: concise description of the problem
  • Why: explanation of why this matters — what will go wrong
  • How: specific, actionable fix recommendation

Read the full file on GitHub · 103 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 103 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A d522c079b54e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

architecture-critic is a skill published in the GitHub repository GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 974 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to approach-critic, differing in 14 lines, and is treated as a copy.