Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools --skill command-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/command-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/command-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/command-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/command-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/command-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01076 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00215 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
command-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Command Audit
Audit a Claude Code command for quality, security, and correctness. Each issue is presented one at a time with multiple resolution options, always including a research option that forks parallel code + web research agents.
Input
$ARGUMENTS — path to the command .md file.
Parse Arguments
Extract from $ARGUMENTS:
- Command Path: Path to the
.mdfile - Verify the file exists and has
.mdextension. If not found, report error and stop. - Extract command name from filename (without
.mdextension).
Process
Phase 1: Load Documents
- Read the command
.mdfile. - Read the audit checklist at
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/checklist.md. - Parse the frontmatter (YAML between
---delimiters) and body content separately. - Determine the command's parent directory to check namespace conventions.
Phase 2: Run All Checks
Evaluate every check from the checklist against the loaded command. For each check:
- Determine status: PASS, FAIL, or N/A
- For FAIL: record the severity and a specific description of what's wrong
Build a prioritized issue queue:
- 🔴 CRITICAL issues first
- 🟡 WARNING issues next
- 🔵 INFO issues last
- ❓ Open Questions last
Phase 3: Present Summary
## Command Audit Summary: [command name]
**File:** [path]
**Lines:** [line count]
Found **N issues** and **M open questions**:
- 🔴 CRITICAL: [count]
- 🟡 WARNING: [count]
- 🔵 INFO: [count]
- ❓ Open Questions: [count]
Starting sequential resolution...
If zero issues found, skip to Phase 5 with PASS verdict.
Phase 4: Sequential Resolution
For each issue, present using AskUserQuestion with:
- Clear description of the issue and which checklist item it violates
- At least 2 fix options (one marked ⭐ recommended)
- Always include "🔍 Research code & web" option
- Always include "Skip" as last option
When "🔍 Research code & web" is chosen:
Launch two parallel agents:
Agent 1 — Code Research:
"Search the codebase for examples of how other commands handle: [specific aspect].
Look in ~/.claude/commands/, .claude/commands/, and any plugins/*/commands/ directories.
Return findings with file:line citations."
Agent 2 — Web Research:
"Search the official Claude Code documentation for best practices on: [specific aspect].
Focus on: command authoring, allowed-tools patterns, security best practices.
Return findings with URLs."
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 152 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 7e9399ccf51e
command-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools (2 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,076 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…