Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools --skill command-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/command-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/command-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/command-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/command-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/googilyboogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools/command-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00052 | $0.01076 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00538 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00215 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00108 |
Grade A, and why
command-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 152 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Command Audit
Audit a Claude Code command for quality, security, and correctness. Each issue is presented one at a time with multiple resolution options, always including a research option that forks parallel code + web research agents.
Input
$ARGUMENTS — path to the command .md file.
Parse Arguments
Extract from $ARGUMENTS:
- Command Path: Path to the
.mdfile - Verify the file exists and has
.mdextension. If not found, report error and stop. - Extract command name from filename (without
.mdextension).
Process
Phase 1: Load Documents
- Read the command
.mdfile. - Read the audit checklist at
${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/references/checklist.md. - Parse the frontmatter (YAML between
---delimiters) and body content separately. - Determine the command's parent directory to check namespace conventions.
Phase 2: Run All Checks
Evaluate every check from the checklist against the loaded command. For each check:
- Determine status: PASS, FAIL, or N/A
- For FAIL: record the severity and a specific description of what's wrong
Build a prioritized issue queue:
- 🔴 CRITICAL issues first
- 🟡 WARNING issues next
- 🔵 INFO issues last
- ❓ Open Questions last
Phase 3: Present Summary
## Command Audit Summary: [command name]
**File:** [path]
**Lines:** [line count]
Found **N issues** and **M open questions**:
- 🔴 CRITICAL: [count]
- 🟡 WARNING: [count]
- 🔵 INFO: [count]
- ❓ Open Questions: [count]
Starting sequential resolution...
If zero issues found, skip to Phase 5 with PASS verdict.
Phase 4: Sequential Resolution
For each issue, present using AskUserQuestion with:
- Clear description of the issue and which checklist item it violates
- At least 2 fix options (one marked ⭐ recommended)
- Always include "🔍 Research code & web" option
- Always include "Skip" as last option
When "🔍 Research code & web" is chosen:
Launch two parallel agents:
Agent 1 — Code Research:
"Search the codebase for examples of how other commands handle: [specific aspect].
Look in ~/.claude/commands/, .claude/commands/, and any plugins/*/commands/ directories.
Return findings with file:line citations."
Agent 2 — Web Research:
"Search the official Claude Code documentation for best practices on: [specific aspect].
Focus on: command authoring, allowed-tools patterns, security best practices.
Return findings with URLs."
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 152 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 7e9399ccf51e
command-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository GoogilyBoogily/googilyboogily-claude-power-tools (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,076 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…