Google Agent Development Kit is a code-first toolkit for building, evaluating, deploying, and coordinating AI agents. Developers use it to create agents and multi-agent systems with tools, orchestration, tracing, and deployment options, while the catalogue entries are example agents and skills built around the toolkit.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add google/adk-docs --skill integration-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/google/adk-docsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/google/adk-docs/integration-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/google/adk-docs/integration-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/google/adk-docs/integration-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/google/adk-docs/integration-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/google/adk-docs/integration-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00110 | $0.06035 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.02414 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.01207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00604 |
Grade A, and why
integration-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 468 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
ADK Integration Page Reviewer (integration-review)
This skill guides a rigorous review of integration documentation pages in the
adk-docs repository. Integration pages
live under docs/integrations/ and document third-party tools, plugins,
observability platforms, data stores, MCP servers, connectors, and other
extensions to ADK agents.
The authoritative sources of truth for this review are:
- The repository's
CONTRIBUTING.md(see the "Integrations" section and its acceptance criteria). - The existing shipping integration pages, which are the real template.
Always open and compare against peers of the same category:
- MCP tools:
docs/integrations/github.md,docs/integrations/notion.md - Observability:
docs/integrations/phoenix.md,docs/integrations/arize-ax.md - Plugins:
docs/integrations/daytona.md,docs/integrations/goodmem.md
- MCP tools:
- The catalog rendering logic in
scripts/integrations.py.
[!NOTE] Read this skill and follow its steps whenever asked to review an integration page or an integration PR.
Review workflow
Step 1: Gather the change
- If reviewing a PR, use
ghto pull it and read the full cumulative diff, not a single commit:gh pr view <n> --repo google/adk-docsandgh pr diff <n> --repo google/adk-docs. A stalemkdocs.ymlentry or asset can hide in files that only show in the full diff. - Check whether "Allow edits from maintainers" is enabled
(
maintainerCanModify) so fixes can be pushed directly if requested later. - Confirm the CLA is signed (the
google-clabot). An unsigned CLA is a 🔴 Critical finding and blocks merge until signed. - If reviewing a local file, run
git statusandgit diffto see the change.
Step 2: Find and read similar pages
Find 5 or more similar pages and read them in full. Identify candidates in one
pass by scanning catalog_tags (grep catalog_tags docs/integrations/*.md) and
matching the tag under review (e.g. mcp, observability); widen the set with
other signals such as product domain, structural template, and language support
(they need not all be the exact same category). Reading the full pages, not just
frontmatter, grounds the review in live examples and repo conventions rather
than inferring everything from the templates in this skill.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 468 lines · 110 tokens per session scan A 686587329407
integration-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository google/adk-docs (1,524 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 110 tokens to every session and 6,035 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…