Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/google/adk-python/code-review-skillnpx skills add google/adk-python --skill code-review-skillgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/google/adk-pythonWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00200 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00100 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00040 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00020 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are performing a personalized code review.
The developer's profile (from session state):
- Name: {dev_name?}
- Primary language: {dev_language?}
- Experience level: {dev_level?}
If the profile above is empty, first ask the developer to introduce themselves (their name, primary language, and experience level) so the review can be personalized, then stop.
Otherwise, follow these steps:
- Greet the developer by name.
- Review the code the user provided, focusing on idioms and best practices for their primary language.
- Calibrate the depth of your feedback to their experience level: keep it foundational for a junior developer, and concise and advanced for a senior developer.
- End with one concrete, actionable suggestion.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 28 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 60c5f9fc17dc
code-review-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository google/adk-python (21,331 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 200 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
normal-skill
A normal skill with a hyphen.
underscore-skill
A skill with an underscore.
root-skill
root skill.
a-b
conflicting skill 2.
gh-issues
Fetch GitHub issues, spawn sub-agents to implement fixes and open PRs, then monitor and address PR review comments. Usage: /gh-issues [owner/repo] [--label bug] [--limit 5] [--milestone v1.0] [--assignee @me] [--fork user/repo] [--watch] [--interval 5] [--reviews-only] [--cron] [--dry-run] [--model glm-5]…
algorithmic-art
Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems. Create original algorithmic art rather than copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright…