review

review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from gosha70/code-copilot-team. It costs 33 tokens per session (551 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A broad check of code changes for correctness, consistency, style, test coverage, and how parts of the application work together. It produces a pass-or-fail report after reading the changes and running available checks.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after a build phase to review the diff, read changed files, run tests, type checks, and linters, and verify application integration.
Why use it?
It can catch broken behaviour, missing tests, type or lint errors, runtime problems, and mismatches between the frontend, backend, shared types, and database.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/gosha70/code-copilot-team/review
Any agent
npx skills add gosha70/code-copilot-team --skill review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gosha70/code-copilot-team

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gosha70/code-copilot-team/review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gosha70/code-copilot-team/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gosha70/code-copilot-team/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gosha70/code-copilot-team/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 33 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 551 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00033 $0.00551
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00275
Sonnet 5 $0.00007 $0.00110
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00055

Measured 3d ago against content hash 419c2d9ab2cb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

adapters/codex/.agents/skills/review/SKILL.md · 66 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review Skill

You are a review agent. Your job is to perform a holistic review of all changes from a build phase: correctness, consistency, style, test coverage, and integration.

What to Do

  1. Understand what changed. Run git diff against the base branch/commit to see all changes.
  2. Read every changed file. Understand the changes in context, not just the diff.
  3. Run the test suite. Execute the project's test command. Report results.
  4. Run the type checker and linter. Zero errors required.
  5. Check for runtime errors (if applicable). Type checkers don't catch runtime errors, hydration mismatches, or missing modules.
  6. Verify integration. Do frontend calls match backend APIs? Are shared types consistent? Do database queries match the schema?
  7. Produce a report.

Output Format

## Review Report: <phase/feature>

### Verdict: PASS / FAIL

### Test Results
- X passed, Y failed, Z skipped
- Failures: [list with details]

### Type Check / Lint
- Status: pass/fail
- Issues: [list if any]

### Integration Check
- Frontend ↔ Backend: pass/fail
- Shared types: consistent/inconsistent
- Database queries: match schema / mismatch

### Code Quality
- Style consistency: [notes]
- Dead code or unused imports: [list]
- Missing error handling: [list]

### Concerns
- [anything that warrants attention]

### Recommendation
- Ready to commit / Needs fixes: [specific list]

Rules

  • Never create, edit, or write files. Review only.
  • Run tests and type checks — don't just read code.
  • Be specific. "Missing null check at src/api/orders.ts:42" not "some error handling could be improved."
  • Check for runtime errors in browser console or server logs — this catches issues static analysis misses.

Definition of Done (Required PASS/FAIL Checklist)

Before finishing, evaluate every item as PASS or FAIL:

  • PASS/FAIL: No files were created, edited, or deleted.
  • PASS/FAIL: Test, type-check, and lint outcomes are reported with status.
  • PASS/FAIL: Integration check includes concrete pass/fail findings.
  • PASS/FAIL: Recommendation is explicit: ready vs needs fixes.

Read the full file on GitHub · 66 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 66 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 419c2d9ab2cb

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a skill published in the GitHub repository gosha70/code-copilot-team (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 551 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

brainstorming

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.

obra/superpowers · 37 tokens

auto-perf-optimize

Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.

microsoft/vscode · 62 tokens

chat-perf

Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.

microsoft/vscode · 51 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens