Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gpauloski/python-template --skill checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gpauloski/python-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpauloski/python-template/check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpauloski/python-template/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpauloski/python-template/check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpauloski/python-template/check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpauloski/python-template/check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.00211 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00084 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00042 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run the local quality gate
Reproduce what CI runs, in order. Stop and report on the first failure.
- Sync and activate the environment:
uv sync source .venv/bin/activate - Run all pre-commit hooks (Ruff, mypy, typos, complexipy, ...):
prek run --all-files - Run the test suite (fast path — current interpreter):
pytest - Optionally run the full matrix and docs build (slower):
tox
Report which steps passed/failed. If a hook auto-fixed files, re-stage them and re-run step 2.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 30 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 3c120c05f19c
check is a skill published in the GitHub repository gpauloski/python-template (19 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 211 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Perform a structured code review of changes, checking for correctness, style, tests, and potential issues.
cli-command
Design, implement, or review Composio CLI commands under ts/packages/cli using Effect, effect/cli, services, output conventions, configuration and environment variables, and local vendor references. Use for CLI command UX, command wiring, service changes, or CLI source edits. Do not use for CLI E2E-only work; use…
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review, two modes. Strategic Matrix v4.3 (MTA-004) for arguments/plans/decisions: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Summary. Deliverable Audit for built artefacts (assignments, reports, code outputs): isolated fresh-context hunt against the brief…
write-plan
Use when you have a finalized brainstorm-beagle spec at .beagle/concepts/ /spec.md and need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan before any code is written. Triggers on: "write a plan", "plan this spec", "turn the spec into a plan", "now plan the implementation", "write-plan". Reads the spec, designs the file…
quick-plan
Use when you need a bite-sized, TDD-driven implementation plan but do NOT have a brainstorm-beagle spec to plan against. quick-plan reconstructs intent from the current conversation, fans out domain-expert exploration subagents across the codebase, and synthesizes the same plan format write-plan produces — without…
review-plan
Review implementation plans for parallelization, TDD, types, libraries, and security before execution.