Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gpsaggese/helpers --skill auto_task.execute_interactivelygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gpsaggese/helpersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/auto_task.execute_interactively)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/auto_task.execute_interactively"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/auto_task.execute_interactively/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/auto_task.execute_interactively"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/auto_task.execute_interactively.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.01034 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00414 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
auto_task.execute_interactively scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Goal
- Execute an ordered list of well-specified, sequential tasks
<FILE>by alternating agent execution, human review, and commit in a branch - Create the GH issue, branch, and PR for
<FILE>before the loop: eachauto_taskmaps to one GH issue and one branch/PR (see.claude/skills/auto_task.rules.md) - Follow
.claude/skills/auto_task.rules.mdfor how tasks are queued, specified, and named
When to Use This Skill
- Follow
.claude/skills/auto_task.rules.mdsection "Ask for Clarification Before Executing an Unclear Plan" when a task's spec is unclear or incomplete
Conventions
- Follow
.claude/skills/auto_task.rules.mdfor queue, spec, naming, and coding/testing conventions
Constraints
- Create the GH issue, branch, and (draft) PR for
<FILE>up front: this is this skill's job, not the user's - Do not commit any code change for a task: committing is the user's decision
- Do not merge any PR: merging is the user's decision
Workflow
Confirm the Task List
- Read
<FILE>and follow.claude/skills/auto_task.rules.mdsection "Confirm the Task List Before Executing" for the format and the problem/solution check - Make sure each task is clear. Add a plan of 5 markdown bullets under each task
- If the order or a dependency is unclear, follow the "Ask for Clarification Before
Executing an Unclear Plan" section of
.claude/skills/auto_task.rules.mdbefore starting
Create the Issue and the Branch
-
Follow
.claude/skills/auto_task.rules.mdsection "One GitHub Issue Is the Unit of Work": one GH issue covers the whole task list in<FILE> -
Create the issue and branch (
<RepoPrefix>Task<IssueNum>_<Description>) in one shot withgit_create_issue_and_branch.py. Unlikeinvoke gh_issue_createandinvoke git_branch_create, it also branches submodules (e.g.,helpers_root)> git_create_issue_and_branch.py \ --gh_issue_title "<TITLE>" --gh_issue_body "<Description of the task list>" \ --no_create_pr
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 102 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A d8466b232162
auto_task.execute_interactively is a skill published in the GitHub repository gpsaggese/helpers (158 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,034 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-06.
auto_task.execute_interactively compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| auto_task.execute_interactivelygpsaggese/helpers | Skill | 158 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 15 | Claude Code |
| merge-batchdiegosouzapw/OmniRoute | Skill | 83k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| prowler-commitprowler-cloud/prowler | Skill | 15k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 44 | Claude Code, Codex |
| gh-auth-isolationgithub/gh-aw | Skill | 5.6k | today | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code, Codex |
| comet-githubrpamis/comet | Skill | 3.3k | yesterday | MIT | A | 72 | Claude Code, Codex |
| github-skillzeenie-ai/OpenCompany | Skill | 1.1k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 51 | Claude Code |
| release-helperSahir619/fable-method | Skill | 2.3k | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |