Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gpsaggese/helpers --skill coding.annotate_with_todoaigit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gpsaggese/helpersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding.annotate_with_todoai)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding.annotate_with_todoai"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding.annotate_with_todoai/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding.annotate_with_todoai"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/coding.annotate_with_todoai.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00387 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00155 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
coding.annotate_with_todoai scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Goal
- Annotate the file
<FILE>with TODOs for each violated rule and convention
Workflow
Determine the Rules to Apply
- If
<FILE>is a Python file, use<RULES>.claude/skills/coding.rules.md
- If
<FILE>is a Python testing file (e.g.,test/test_*.py), use<RULES>.claude/skills/coding.rules.md.claude/skills/testing.rules.md
- Print the rule files
<RULES>used for each file in<FILE> - Read the rule files
<RULES>carefully
Annotate with TODOs
- Annotate every point in
<FILE>that violates<RULES>, adding a TODO before it, like# TODO(ai_gp): Apply <RULE> before the point with violation - E.g.,
# TODO(ai_gp): Apply "Replace Checking Invariants with `assert_equal` - Do not use multiple `assertIn()` calls to check individual pieces of a string output; instead compare the entire output with `assert_equal()`" self.assertIn("Failed Tests Summary", actual) self.assertIn("test_method1", actual) self.assertIn("test_method2", actual) self.assertIn("Total failing tests: 2", actual)
Ask User to Continue
- Ask the user to commit and then ask to continue
- If the user says to continue, run the skill
/coding.todoai_gpon<FILE>
Verification
- Confirm every violation of
<RULES>in<FILE>is caught and annotated with a TODO
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 42 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 2a8d3b4e9d9f
coding.annotate_with_todoai is a skill published in the GitHub repository gpsaggese/helpers (158 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 387 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-06.
coding.annotate_with_todoai compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| coding.annotate_with_todoaigpsaggese/helpers | Skill | 158 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| mcore-linting-and-formattingNVIDIA/skills | Skill | 3.9k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| splitting-oversized-modulesPostHog/posthog-foss | Skill | 728 | today | MIT | A | 197 | Claude Code, Codex |
| python-review-checklistawslabs/cli-agent-orchestrator | Skill | 1.5k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 20 | Claude Code, Codex |
| splitting-oversized-modulesPostHog/posthog | Skill | 41k | today | none | A | 197 | Claude Code, Codex |
| best-practicesFradSer/dotclaude | Skill | 596 | yesterday | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code |
| plankton-code-qualityloulanyue/awesome-claude-notes | Skill | 271 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 34 | Claude Code |