Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add gpsaggese/helpers --skill text.humanizegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gpsaggese/helpersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/text.humanize)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/text.humanize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/text.humanize/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/text.humanize"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gpsaggese/helpers/text.humanize.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.02401 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00960 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00480 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00240 |
Grade A, and why
text.humanize scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- text.humanize — 89% identical, 144 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Goal
- Change text with recognizable AI mannerisms (hedging, dramatic pivots, cliched transitions). Clean up AI-written content that is factually correct but flat
What This Skill Preserves
- Author's opinions, arguments, and claims
- Document structure and organization
- Paragraph and section order
- Core meaning and facts
- Intentional stylistic choices (fragments, unconventional punctuation, etc.)
Workflow
Core Principles
- Edit, don't rewrite. Clean up pattern slop, keep the voice, opinions, structure, and meaning
- Apply systematically: check all 19 rules below. Skip a rule only if it does not apply
- Use judgment on conflicts. If breaking a rule serves the writing (e.g., a well-placed em dash for effect), keep it
- Change nothing else: no reordered paragraphs, added ideas, rephrased core arguments, or altered facts
Pattern Checklist
Scan for these AI markers before applying detailed rules:
- Overused Words and Jargon
- Grandiose: "vital", "pivotal", "groundbreaking", "robust", "comprehensive", "nuanced", "multifaceted", "transformative"
- AI vocabulary: "delve", "leverage" (verb), "reimagine", "empower", "unpack", "synergy"
- Filler and Hedges
- "It's worth noting that", "It's important to remember", "It should be noted", "Interestingly enough"
- "Something we've observed", "This is where X really shines"
- Theatrical Transitions and Pivots
- Throat-clearing: "Let's dive in", "Let's unpack", "In this article, we'll"
- Dramatic pivots: "But here's the thing", "Here's the catch", "Here's what most people miss"
- Overused connectors: "Furthermore", "Moreover", "Additionally", "In addition to the above"
- Rhetorical openers: "So what does this mean for you?", "Why does this matter?"
- Structural Patterns
- Gift-wrapped endings: "In summary", "In conclusion", "Ultimately", "At the end of the day", "Moving forward"
- Exhaustive lists: 7-10 items when 3-4 would suffice
- Passive voice clusters: 2+ passive sentences in a row
- Corrective antithesis: "Not X. But Y." setup-payoff constructions
- Meta-Language and Vagueness
- Meta-verbs: "highlights", "underscores", "emphasizes", "showcases", "illustrates"
- Vague attribution: "some experts say", "widely covered", "significant attention"
- Copy-paste metaphors: same metaphor repeated word-for-word 3+ times
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 220 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 1fe35caea993
text.humanize is a skill published in the GitHub repository gpsaggese/helpers (158 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 2,401 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-06.
text.humanize compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| text.humanizegpsaggese/helpers | Skill | 158 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 134k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | today | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 314k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| chat-pet-sprite-creationmicrosoft/vscode | Skill | 195k | today | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |