Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/gracefullight/krds/reviewnpx skills add gracefullight/krds --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/gracefullight/krdsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/gracefullight/krds/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/gracefullight/krds/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/gracefullight/krds/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00071 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00036 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00014 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00007 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 12 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A d4059882c270
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository gracefullight/krds (46 stars, last pushed 3d ago), with no licence file. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 71 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
daisyui-config
Configuration options for daisyUI 5.
designlang-tokens
Use when styling UI for cal.com — references the extracted design system tokens instead of inventing colors, spacing, or typography.
design-negotiation
Advocate for design quality, scope, and timeline with partners and leadership using evidence and shared goals. Use in the conversation itself. For the commercial vocabulary behind it, use business-design (ux-strategy).
version-control-strategy
Define version control for design files, components, and libraries — branching, naming, and release. Use when file history is chaotic. For design system contribution rules, use design-system-governance (design-systems).
ss-studio
Turn a product brief and optional references into three distinct creative directions, a human-selected StyleSeed interaction plan, generated image/video asset jobs, a working UI prototype, and a verified prototype-first showcase reel. Use for client concepts, app interaction exploration, trendy but coherent UI…
accessibility-audit
Audit an existing interface against WCAG, producing findings with severity ratings and remediation steps. Use when you have a design or build to assess now. Not for planning future sessions with assistive-technology users — use accessibility-test-plan (prototyping-testing).