Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add griddynamics/rosetta --skill ui-aqa-flowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/griddynamics/rosettaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/griddynamics/rosetta/ui-aqa-flow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.02861 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01144 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00572 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00286 |
Grade A, and why
ui-aqa-flow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 140 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<ui_aqa_flow>
<description_and_purpose>
End-to-end test automation from requirements gathering to test implementation. Uses test cases, project documentation to create automated tests following existing architecture and coding standards.
Prerequisite: Rosetta Prep Steps.
Terminology. External systems are named by role throughout this workflow and its phases: Test Management System (TMS), Issue Tracker, and Wiki. TestRail, Jira, and Confluence are canonical examples only — adapt identifiers, URLs, requests, calls, and query syntax to the systems resolved for the current project (from repository-root gain.json, explicit user input, recognizable URLs/handles, and available integrations).
</description_and_purpose>
<workflow_phases>
Execution cadence:
- All Rosetta prep steps MUST be FULLY completed
- USE SKILL
load-project-context,orchestration,hitl - MUST ALWAYS use todo tasks ledger, ASAP. Phases are sequential. Independent tasks can run in parallel.
- Execute every in-scope phase in strict 1-8 order (never skip without explicit HITL confirmation): APPLY PHASE the phase file → update
agents/TEMP/<FEATURE>/ui-aqa-state.md→ next; never start a phase until the previous is marked done inui-aqa-state.md. - MUST follow JIT phase-by-phase: do not load/act IN ADVANCE.
- Skip gates, transitions, and escalation →
<orchestration_and_escalation>. - MUST ALWAYS use todo tasks ledger, ASAP. Prioritize ACCURACY over SPEED. Proactively use available tools/MCPs, if question can be answered from code or MCP call - do that first.
No assumptions:
- NO ASSUMPTIONS: never assume selectors, flows, or data — ask the user when information is missing.
Customization:
- If the user gave no preferences, perform all steps except optional.
- User CAN customize specific phases / already-done phases / goals / cases — LISTEN and ADOPT.
Authoritative rules (do not skim past):
- USE SKILL
codingbefore any work touching repository tests, page objects, or shared helpers — authoritative for conventions; repository docs win over skill snippets. - Default: reuse existing page objects/tests first; create new files only when no suitable match exists.
- Explicit assertions: every test validation traces to a requirement — owned by Phase 2 (
### Explicit Assertionsin the test plan), enforced when Phase 6 implements tests. - Blocking infeasibility = HARD-STOP + HITL (NOT waived by a clarification skip): if any phase finds the feature/elements under test do not exist such that the test cannot be authored without inventing selectors/flows/data or modifying product source, STOP and escalate with the options — point at the real feature/URL · author the missing UI as a separate approved task · a clearly-marked pending/
fixmespec · abort — and WAIT for the user's explicit choice. "Skip clarification" waives clarification questions only; it never authorizes this feasibility/scope call.
<data_collection phase="1" applies="ALL" subagent="discoverer" role="UI-AQA data collector" subagent_required_model="inherit">
- APPLY SKILL FILE
phases/ui-aqa-flow-data-collection.md - Input: user request + repository-root
gain.json+ project context at its configured paths (canonical:docs/CONTEXT.md,docs/ARCHITECTURE.md,agents/IMPLEMENTATION.md). Output: test plan atplans/ui-aqa-<test-name>/test-plan.md - Required skills:
data-collection,sensitive-data,qa-structure,qa-knowledge - Update
agents/TEMP/<FEATURE>/ui-aqa-state.md; Phase 1 is not complete until its output spot-check passes. </data_collection>
<requirements_clarification phase="2" applies="ALL" subagent="architect" role="Test requirements analyst" subagent_required_model="inherit" type="HITL">
- APPLY SKILL FILE
phases/ui-aqa-flow-requirements-clarification.md - Input: user request + collected data from Phase 1. Output: clarified requirements + typed assertion list in the test plan
- WAIT FOR USER ANSWERS to the clarifying questions before Phase 3.
- Required skills:
qa-knowledge(gap_analysismode),qa-structure - Recommended skills:
questioning - Update
agents/TEMP/<FEATURE>/ui-aqa-state.md; Phase 2 is not complete until its output spot-check passes. </requirements_clarification>
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- phases/ui-aqa-flow-code-analysis.md 7.0 KB
- phases/ui-aqa-flow-data-collection.md 8.6 KB
- phases/ui-aqa-flow-requirements-clarification.md 6.8 KB
- phases/ui-aqa-flow-selector-identification.md 7.2 KB
- phases/ui-aqa-flow-selector-implementation.md 6.3 KB
- phases/ui-aqa-flow-test-correction.md 6.9 KB
- phases/ui-aqa-flow-test-implementation.md 8.7 KB
- phases/ui-aqa-flow-test-report-analysis.md 8.3 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 140 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A 74106327fd1c
ui-aqa-flow is a skill published in the GitHub repository griddynamics/rosetta (360 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 2,861 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
e2e-tests
Tests E2E Playwright pour SaaS Next.js : setup, Page Object Model, auth state, flows critiques (login, billing, onboarding), CI GitHub Actions.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
running-livekit-simulations
Runs LiveKit agent simulations and acts on the results. Use when the user says "run my simulations", "regression test my agent before deploying", "run the scenarios", "use lk agent simulate", "did my agent pass", "why did this scenario fail", "run simulations in CI", "test the audio pipeline", "check turn-taking and…
character-animation-qa
Review local character animation with schema checks, Playwright browser previews, frame sampling, and FFmpeg/ffprobe final output checks.
designing-tests
Designs and implements testing strategies for any codebase. Use when adding tests, improving coverage, setting up testing infrastructure, debugging test failures, or when asked about unit tests, integration tests, or E2E testing.
flutter-mcp-toolkit-control
Drive a running Flutter app — tap, scroll, type, fill forms, hot-reload, navigate. Use when you need to interact with the UI.